Title

Development And Testing Of A Modified Version Of The Brief Pain Inventory For Use In Residential Aged Care Facilities

Document Type

Journal Article

Publisher

Wiley

Faculty

Faculty of Computing, Health and Science

School

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Postgraduate Medicine

Comments

This article was originally published as : Auret, K. A., Toye, C., Goucke, R., Kristjanson, L. J., Bruce, D., & Schug, S. (2008). Development and testing of a modified version of the Brief Pain Inventory for use in residential aged care facilities. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(2), 301-306. Original article available here

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A two-phase study was conducted to refine a version of Cleeland's Brief Pain Inventory (BPI, Short Form) for use in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). DESIGN: The Australian Pain Society modified Cleeland's BPI by changing numerical response options to word descriptors. In Phase I, this version was tested in RACFs to determine the feasibility of its use, its stability over time, and its internal consistency reliability. Minor modifications resulted. In Phase II, the refined version was abbreviated, and the internal consistency reliability of this Modified Residents' Verbal BPI was examined. SETTING: RACFs. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three residents of RACFs in Phase I, 149 in Phase II. INTERVENTION: The study revised and abbreviated the BPI to better fit it for use in RACFs, examining the reliability of the tool. MEASUREMENTS: Mini-Mental State Examination, Global Deterioration Scale, modified BPI. RESULTS: The abbreviated tool comprises three items assessing pain intensity and three assessing pain interference. It also includes an item to specify pain location and a movement protocol. Cronbach alpha coefficient for six intensity and interference items was 0.72 (N=106). CONCLUSION: This abbreviated tool requires further testing but has demonstrated adequate internal consistency reliability and is a brief, multidimensional tool that appears feasible for assessing pain in RACFs, including use with residents who have some cognitive impairment. It shows promise as a screening tool and may be useful to assess the effectiveness of pain relief interventions and to measure pain prevalence.

DOI

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01546.x

 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01546.x