Title

Regulator Guidance and Legislation Relevant to Pit Lakes

Document Type

Book Chapter

Publisher

Australian Centre for Geomechanics

Editor(s)

Clint D. McCullough

Faculty

Faculty of Computing, Health and Science

School

School of Natural Sciences

RAS ID

13461

Comments

This chapter was originally published as: Jones, H., & Mccullough, C. D. (2011). Regulator guidance and legislation relevant to pit lakes. In Clint D. McCullough (Eds.). Mine Pit Lakes: Closure and Management (pp. 137-152). Perth, Western Australia: Australian Centre for Geomechanics.

Abstract

Open cut mining that develops pit lakes is common internationally, but regulatory guidance specific for pit lake formation and development is sparse in the international context. Instead, approaches toward pit lake development have generally been made by considering every mine site as unique. As a result, current international practice is that development of pit lakes should, and are generally managed on a case-by-case , basis. There are a wide range of broad but non-specific forms of regulatory direction and processes such as water quality guidelines to allow for an initial decision-making strategy on whether it is desirable for pit , lakes to form and as to what potential end uses may be. However, most of the regulatory guidance focuses heavily on risk as the sale pit lake end point at mine closure. Development of clear social or environmental end use goals in pit lakes uses may provide either provide benefit or to even offset some of the risk. Once an end use goal is established and comfortably articulated as fitting with broader company sustainability strategies, it will assist in the development of general conceptual plans for a mine pit lake at lease relinquishment. It will also serve to inform regulators of a well-developed concept for going beyond current broad guidelines for pit lake formation and management to better achieve corporate goals of sustainability and social licence-to-mine. The timescale for the evolution of lakes as end uses may be in the order of hundreds of years. In order to be successful, presenting a well-developed pit void closure plan to regulators and stakeholders should ideally be the conclusion of many years of a well-developed strategy of testing, refinement and stakeholder engagement of an end use development proposal.

This document is currently not available here.

 
COinS