Title

Supporting family caregivers of hospitalised palliative care patients: a psycho-educational group intervention

Document Type

Journal Article

Faculty

Faculty of Computing, Health and Science

School

School of Nursing and Midwifery / Clinical Nursing and Midwifery Research Centre

RAS ID

14777

Comments

This article was originally published as: Hudson, P., Trauer, T., Lobb, E. , Zorden, R., Williams, A. , Quinn, K., Summers, M., & Thomas, K. (2012). Supporting family caregivers of hospitalised palliative care patients: a psycho-educational group intervention. . BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care , 2(2), 115-120. Original article available here

Abstract

Background: Many family caregivers of palliative care patients experience poor health and have other unmet needs, requiring health professionals' support. However, there are few evidence-based supportive interventions to address these issues. Purpose: The purpose of this project was to undertake preliminary testing of a psychoeducational group education programme, delivered in an in-patient setting, designed to prepare family caregivers for the role of supporting a relative currently receiving hospital-based palliative care. Methods: A pilot phase was conducted to develop the intervention and explore its utility. Thereafter the single session intervention was delivered in five palliative care units in three states of Australia and its effectiveness was examined using a pre–post design. Outcome variables included caregiver preparedness, competence and unmet needs. Psychological wellbeing was measured in order to determine if there were any deleterious psychological outcomes. Results: One hundred and twenty-six participants completed Time 1 data and 107 (84.9%) completed Time 2 data (post-intervention). There were statistically significant improvements in caregivers' sense of preparedness (p=<.001; effect size (ES) 0.43) and a significant reduction in unmet caregiver needs (p=014; ES 0.22). There was no significant effect on psychological wellbeing and the improvement on competence fell short of statistical significance. Conclusions: This study reinforces the notion that psychoeducational interventions for this population can potentially be applicable, acceptable and effective. However, the number of participants who were recruited and attended each session was fewer than anticipated, resulting in methodological implications. It is recommended that the intervention undergo further empirical inquiry, such as via a controlled trial.

Share

 
COinS