Title

Current research and statistical practices in sport science and a need for change

Document Type

Journal Article

Publisher

MDPI

School

Center for Exercise and Sport Science Research

RAS ID

25630

Comments

Originally published as:

Bernards, J. R., Sato, K., Haff, G. G., & Bazyler, C. D. (2017). Current research and statistical practices in sport science and a need for change. Sports, 5(4), 87. doi:10.3390/sports5040087

Original article available here.

Abstract

Current research ideologies in sport science allow for the possibility of investigators producing statistically significant results to help fit the outcome into a predetermined theory. Additionally, under the current Neyman-Pearson statistical structure, some argue that null hypothesis significant testing (NHST) under the frequentist approach is flawed, regardless. For example, a p-value is unable to measure the probability that the studied hypothesis is true, unable to measure the size of an effect or the importance of a result, and unable to provide a good measure of evidence regarding a model or hypothesis. Many of these downfalls are key questions researchers strive to answer following an investigation. Therefore, a shift towards a magnitude-based inference model, and eventually a fully Bayesian framework, is thought to be a better fit from a statistical standpoint and may be an improved way to address biases within the literature. The goal of this article is to shed light on the current research and statistical shortcomings the field of sport science faces today, and offer potential solutions to help guide future research practices.

DOI

10.3390/sports5040087

Access Rights

Free_to_read

Share

 
COinS