Australia, March 2003 : the print media, democracy and the decision to invade Iraq
Date of Award
Master of Communications
School of Communications and Arts
Faculty of Education and Arts
Models of mass media and democracy, as commonly discussed by media theorists, suggest there is a tight ideological relationship between the dominant discourse of mass media outlets and incumbent governments (Chomsky, 1997; Curran, 2002; Curran and Gurevitch, 2001; Curran and Park, 1996; Curran and Seaton, 1986; Herman and Chomsky, 1986; Herman and McChesney, 2001; Jacka, 2003; Schultz, 1998). In this thesis I analyse Australian print media opinion pages, and argue that the workings of Herman and Chomksy's Propaganda Model (1988, pp. 1-35) are evident in opinion page output on the Iraq issue. However, when applied to Australia and the Australian government's decision to invade Iraq in March 2003, as part of the Coalition of the Willing, I claim that the tight connection between mass media outlets and the dominant discourse of the government is not as evident. In other words, in this instance the dominant discourse that emerged from an analysis of print opinion pages was not as ideologically synchronised with the position of the Australian government as traditional theory would posit.
Access to this thesis - the full text is restricted to current ECU staff and students only. Email request to firstname.lastname@example.org
Hall, J. (2008). Australia, March 2003 : the print media, democracy and the decision to invade Iraq. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/220