Title

Effect of interset strategies on acute resistance training performance and physiological responses: A systematic review

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research

ISSN

1533-4287

Volume

33

First Page

180

Last Page

180

PubMed ID

30946261

Publisher

National Strength and Conditioning Association

School

Centre for Exercise and Sports Science Research

Comments

Originally published as: Latella, C., Grgic, J., & Van der Westhuizen, D. (2019). Effect of interset strategies on acute resistance training performance and physiological responses: A systematic review. The Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, 33, S180-S193. Original publication available here

Abstract

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the evidence surrounding the implementation of interset strategies to optimize acute resistance training performance. Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus electronic databases were conducted. Studies that met the following criteria were included: (a) compared an interset strategy with a traditional passive rest interval in resistance training, (b) the assessed outcomes included performance or physiological responses, (c) resistance training was performed in a traditional dynamic fashion, (d) the study had an acute design, and (e) was published in English and in a peer-reviewed journal. A total of 26 studies were included in the review. When a given interset strategy was used, several studies reported improvements in the number of performed repetitions (i.e., greater total volume load), attenuation of the loss in velocity and power, reduced lactate levels, and in some cases, a decrease in perceived exertion. Dynamic agonist/static antagonist stretching, cooling, aerobic exercise, vibration, and individualized heart rate-based intervals seem to be the most effective strategies. However, the heterogeneity between study designs and methodologies suggests that careful consideration should be given to the type and specific application of the interset method being used. Given the acute nature of studies, extrapolation to any long-term benefits of using a given interset strategy remains limited. Collectively, coaches and sports scientists may consider using the most effective strategies based on practicality and equipment availability to optimize performance during the resistance training component of strength and conditioning programs.

DOI

10.1519/JSC.0000000000003120

Share

 
COinS