Title

Habitat preferences of macroinvertebrate fauna among seagrasses with varying structural forms

Document Type

Journal Article

Publisher

Elsevier

Faculty

Faculty of Health, Engineering and Science

School

School of Natural Sciences/Centre for Marine Ecosystems Research

RAS ID

16422

Comments

This article was originally published as: Gartner, A. , Tuya, F., Lavery, P. S., & Mcmahon, K. M. (2013). Habitat preferences of macroinvertebrate fauna among seagrasses with varying structural forms. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 439, 143-151. Original article available here

Abstract

The role of habitat structural complexity in shaping faunal communities has been of key interest to marine ecologists for many years, principally due to the association between increased complexity and high abundances and diversity of fauna. Despite this, macroinvertebrate assemblages within seagrasses with varying morphologies and canopy structures have seldom been compared. Algal epiphytes also contribute to the structural complexity of seagrass ecosystems, a factor often overlooked in studies on seagrass structural complexity. We used artificial seagrass units (ASUs) with varying structure to determine the relative importance of food versus structure for macroinvertebrate fauna (Experiment 1). We also tested whether the importance of different structural components of seagrasses for macroinvertebrate fauna was consistent between seagrasses (Amphibolis griffithii, Posidonia sinuosa and Cymodocea nodosa) with naturally different complexity (Experiment 2). In Experiment 1, the treatments with the combination of food and structure together had the greater density of colonizing macroinvertebrates, compared to those where either structure or food were independently tested. In Experiment 2, the density of fauna colonizing ASUs varied among complexities of ASUs, as well as seagrasses. When ASU's were placed alongside A. griffithii and P. sinuosa (species which vary greatly in morphology, but little in available surface area) the highest densities of fauna were generally found on ASUs with artificial epiphytes. This suggests that small-scale variation in structure was more important than large-scale variation in canopy morphology. However, there was no difference in the total density of fauna colonizing onto ASUs placed alongside C. nodosa, which morphologically has a structure similar to P. sinuosa, but much lower surface area. We conclude from these experiments that the effect of high structural complexity in seagrasses is an important driver of macroinvertebrate density, in particular, that provided by algal epiphytes. However, the effect of structural complexity may be reduced when seagrass canopy surface area is limited.

Share

 
COinS