Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Frontiers in Bioinformatics

Volume

4

Publisher

Frontiers

School

Centre for Precision Health / School of Medical and Health Sciences

RAS ID

71192

Funders

Translational Genomics Research Institute / Illinois Department of Public Health / NIA

Grant Number

P30AG10161, R01AG15819, R01AG17917, R01AG30146, R01AG36042, R01AG36836, U01AG46161

Comments

Vacher, M., Canovas, R., Laws, S. M., & Doecke, J. D. (2024). A comprehensive multi-omics analysis reveals unique signatures to predict Alzheimer’s disease. Frontiers in Bioinformatics, 4, 1390607. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbinf.2024.1390607

Abstract

Background: Complex disorders, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD), result from the combined influence of multiple biological and environmental factors. The integration of high-throughput data from multiple omics platforms can provide system overviews, improving our understanding of complex biological processes underlying human disease. In this study, integrated data from four omics platforms were used to characterise biological signatures of AD. Method: The study cohort consists of 455 participants (Control:148, Cases:307) from the Religious Orders Study and Memory and Aging Project (ROSMAP). Genotype (SNP), methylation (CpG), RNA and proteomics data were collected, quality-controlled and pre-processed (SNP = 130; CpG = 83; RNA = 91; Proteomics = 119). Using a diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI)/AD combined as the target phenotype, we first used Partial Least Squares Regression as an unsupervised classification framework to assess the prediction capabilities for each omics dataset individually. We then used a variation of the sparse generalized canonical correlation analysis (sGCCA) to assess predictions of the combined datasets and identify multi-omics signatures characterising each group of participants. Results: Analysing datasets individually we found methylation data provided the best predictions with an accuracy of 0.63 (95%CI = [0.54–0.71]), followed by RNA, 0.61 (95%CI = [0.52–0.69]), SNP, 0.59 (95%CI = [0.51–0.68]) and proteomics, 0.58 (95%CI = [0.51–0.67]). After integration of the four datasets, predictions were dramatically improved with a resulting accuracy of 0.95 (95% CI = [0.89–0.98]). Conclusion: The integration of data from multiple platforms is a powerful approach to explore biological systems and better characterise the biological signatures of AD. The results suggest that integrative methods can identify biomarker panels with improved predictive performance compared to individual platforms alone. Further validation in independent cohorts is required to validate and refine the results presented in this study.

DOI

10.3389/fbinf.2024.1390607

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Included in

Neurosciences Commons

Share

 
COinS