Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Plos One

Publisher

Public Library of Science

School

School of Science

RAS ID

27258

Funders

Parts of this research have been supported by funding from an internal grant by the Librarians Association of the University of California-Los Angeles. Parts of this research have been supported by seed funding from Carnegie Mellon University under an internal grant titled Novice and Expert Information Behavior in the Arab Gulf.

Comments

Mizrachi. D,, Salaz, A,M,, Kurbanoglu, S., Boustany, J., on behalf of the ARFIS Research Group (2018). Academic reading format preferences and behaviors among university students worldwide: A comparative survey analysis. PLoS ONE 13(5): e0197444.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197444

Abstract

This study reports the descriptive and inferential statistical findings of a survey of academic reading format preferences and behaviors of 10,293 tertiary students worldwide. The study hypothesized that country-based differences in schooling systems, socioeconomic development, culture or other factors might have an influence on preferred formats, print or electronic, for academic reading, as well as the learning engagement behaviors of students. The main findings are that country of origin has little to no relationship with or effect on reading format preferences of university students, and that the broad majority of students worldwide prefer to read academic course materials in print. The majority of participants report better focus and retention of information presented in print formats, and more frequently prefer print for longer texts. Additional demographic and post-hoc analysis suggests that format preference has a small relationship with academic rank. The relationship between task demands, format preferences and reading comprehension are discussed. Additional outcomes and implications for the fields of education, psychology, computer science, information science and human-computer interaction are considered.

Additional Information

AFRIS Research Group:

Tania Todorova1, Pan Yantao2, Jiuzhen Zhang3, Daniela Živkovic4, Darija Pešut4, Terttu Kortelainen5, Judit Bar-Ilan6, Noa Aharony6, Elena Collina7, Liga Krumina8, Hanady Geagea9, Silvia Ghinculov10, Ane Landøy11, Almuth Gastinger12, Aurora de la Vega13, Ana Lúcia Terra14, Nicole Johnston15, Angela Repanovici16, Polona Vilar17, René Schneider18, Güleda Dogan19, Serap Kurbanoglu19, Patricia Jamal20, David Bawden21, Jane Secker22, Chris Morrison23, A.M. Salaz24, Diane Mizrachi25*, and Joumana Boustany26

1University of Library Studies and Information Technology, Sofia, Bulgaria

2Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China

3Peking University, Beijing, China

4University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia

5Oulu University, Oulu, Finland

6Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel

7Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

8Latvijas Universitate, Riga, Latvia

9Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon

10Academy of Economic Studies, Chişinău, Moldova

11Bergen University, Bergen, Norway

12Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

13Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, Lima, Peru

14Instituto Politecnico do Porto, Porto, Portugal

15Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Australia

16Transylvania University, Brașov, Romania

17University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

18Haute Ecole de Gestion, Geneva, Switzerland

19Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

20Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

21City University, London, England

22London School of Economics, London, England

23Kent University, Canterbury, England

24Carnegie Mellon University, Doha, Qatar

25University of California, Los Angeles, USA

26Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée, Paris, France

DOI

10.1371/journal.pone.0197444

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Share

 
COinS