Title

First 236U data from the Arctic Ocean and use of 236U/238U and 129I/236U as a new dual tracer

Document Type

Journal Article

Publisher

Elsevier

School

School of Natural Sciences and Centre for Marine Ecosystems Research

RAS ID

21314

Comments

Originally published as :Casacuberta, N., Masqué, P., Henderson, G., van-der-Loeff, M. R., Bauch, D., Vockenhuber, C., ... & Christl, M. (2016). First 236 U data from the Arctic Ocean and use of 236 U/238 U and 129 I/236 U as a new dual tracer. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 440, 127-134. Article can be found here

Abstract

The first dataset of 236U/238U in the water column of the Arctic Ocean (AO) is presented and shows the widest range of ratios reported so far in the open ocean, from (5±5) to (3840±260)×10-12. Surface samples and depth profiles were collected during two GEOTRACES expeditions in 2011-2012 and analyzed for the concentrations of 236U and 129I, with the aim of investigating whether the combination of 236U/238U and 129I/236U can be used as a new oceanographic tool in the AO. Results show that the distributions of the 236U/238U and 129I/236U atomic ratios are consistent with the different water masses in the AO. High 236U/238U and 129I/236U ratios in the upper water column (>2000×10-12 and >200, respectively) illustrate the penetration of Atlantic waters (AW) into the AO. Lower values were found in Pacific waters (PW) and deep waters of the AO. Rivers seem to represent a temporally and spatially-constrained third anthropogenic source of 236U but more data are needed to confirm this. In a simple mixing model, the combination of 236U/238U and 129I/236U reveals a high contribution (>99%) of natural background waters (pre-nuclear era) in the deep and bottom waters of the Amerasian basin, indicating an apparent water mass renewal time of >1000 years. Despite the relatively high apparent age of the Amerasian Basin deep waters, this work shows the potential of using the dual-tracer approach as a new oceanographic tool in the Arctic Ocean. © 2016 Elsevier B.V.

DOI

10.1016/j.epsl.2016.02.020