Authors
Laurien M. Buffart
Joeri Kalter
Maike G. Sweegers
Kerry S. Courneya
Robert U. Newton, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Neil K. Aaronson
Paul B. Jacobsen
Anne M. May
Daniel A. Galvao, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Mai J. Chinapaw
Karen Steindorf
Melinda L. Irwin
Martjin M. Stuiver
Sandi Hayes
Kathleen A. Griffith
Alejandro Lucia
Ilse Mesters
Ellen van Weert
Hans Knoop
Martine M. Goedendorp
Nanette Mutrie
Amanda J. Daley
Alex McConnachie
Martin Bohus
Lene Thorsen
Karl-Heinz Schulz
Camille E. Short
Erica L. James
Ron C. Plotnikoff
Gill Arbane
Martina E. Schmidt
Karin Potthoff
Marc van Beurden
Hester S. Oldenburg
Gabe S. Sonke
Wim H. van Harten
Rachel Garrod
Kathryn H. Schmitz
Kerri M. Winters-Stone
Miranda J. Velthuis
Dennis Taaffe, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Willem van Mechelen
Marie-Jose Kersten
Frans Nollet
Jennifer Wenzel
Joachim Wiskemann
Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw
Johannes Brug
Document Type
Journal Article
Publisher
Elsevier
School
Exercise Medicine Research Institute
RAS ID
23344
Funders
Via “Bas Mulder Award” granted to L.M. Buffart by the Alpe d’HuZes foundation/Dutch Cancer Society (VU 2011-5045)
Abstract
This individual patient data meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise on quality of life (QoL) and physical function (PF) in patients with cancer, and to identify moderator effects of demographic (age, sex, marital status, education), clinical (body mass index, cancer type, presence of metastasis), intervention-related (intervention timing, delivery mode and duration, and type of control group), and exercise-related (exercise frequency, intensity, type, time) characteristics.
Relevant published and unpublished studies were identified in September 2012 via PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, reference checking and personal communications. Principle investigators of all 69 eligible trials were requested to share IPD from their study. IPD from 34 randomised controlled trials (n = 4519 patients) that evaluated the effects of exercise compared to a usual care, wait-list or attention control group on QoL and PF in adult patients with cancer were retrieved and pooled. Linear mixed-effect models were used to evaluate the effects of the exercise on post-intervention outcome values (z-score) adjusting for baseline values. Moderator effects were studies by testing interactions.
Exercise significantly improved QoL (β = 0.15, 95%CI = 0.10;0.20) and PF (β = 0.18, 95%CI = 0.13;0.23). The effects were not moderated by demographic, clinical or exercise characteristics. Effects on QoL (βdifference_in_effect = 0.13, 95%CI = 0.03;0.22) and PF (βdifference_in_effect = 0.10, 95%CI = 0.01;0.20) were significantly larger for supervised than unsupervised interventions.
In conclusion, exercise, and particularly supervised exercise, effectively improves QoL and PF in patients with cancer with different demographic and clinical characteristics during and following treatment. Although effect sizes are small, there is consistent empirical evidence to support implementation of exercise as part of cancer care.
DOI
10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.010
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
Buffart, L. M., Kalter, J., Sweegers, M. G., Courneya, K. S., Newton, R. U., Aaronson, N. K., ... & Steindorf, K. (2017). Effects and moderators of exercise on quality of life and physical function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 34 RCTs. Cancer treatment reviews. 52, 91-104.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2016.11.010