Development of the Aboriginal Communication Assessment After Brain Injury (ACAABI): A screening tool for identifying acquired communication disorders in Aboriginal Australians

Authors

Elizabeth Armstrong, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Natalie Ciccone, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Deborah J. Hersh, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Judith Katzenellebogen
Juli Coffin
Sandra Thompson
Leon Flicker
Colleen Hayward, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Deborah Woods
Meaghan McAllister, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow

Author Identifier

Elizabeth Armstrong
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4469-1117
Natalie Ciccone
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1822-7217
Deborah Hersh
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2466-0225

Document Type

Journal Article

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences / Kurongkurl Katitjin

RAS ID

24783

Funders

National Health and Medical Research Council

Grant Number

NHMRC Numbers : 1132468, 1046228

Grant Link

http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1132468

http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1046228

Comments

This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of:

Armstrong, E. M., Ciccone, N., Hersh, D., Katzenellebogen, J., Coffin, J., Thompson, S., ... & McAllister, M. (2017). Development of the Aboriginal Communication Assessment After Brain Injury (ACAABI): A screening tool for identifying acquired communication disorders in Aboriginal Australians. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19(3), 297-308.

https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2017.1290136

Abstract

Purpose:

Acquired communication disorders (ACD), following stroke and traumatic brain injury, may not be correctly identified in Aboriginal Australians due to a lack of linguistically and culturally appropriate assessment tools. Within this paper we explore key issues that were considered in the development of the Aboriginal Communication Assessment After Brain Injury (ACAABI) – a screening tool designed to assess the presence of ACD in Aboriginal populations.

Method:

A literature review and consultation with key stakeholders were undertaken to explore directions needed to develop a new tool, based on existing tools and recommendations for future developments.

Result:

The literature searches revealed no existing screening tool for ACD in these populations, but identified tools in the areas of cognition and social-emotional wellbeing. Articles retrieved described details of the content and style of these tools, with recommendations for the development and administration of a new tool. The findings from the interview and focus group views were consistent with the approach recommended in the literature.

Conclusions:

There is a need for a screening tool for ACD to be developed but any tool must be informed by knowledge of Aboriginal language, culture and community input in order to be acceptable and valid.

DOI

10.1080/17549507.2017.1290136