Authors
Suzanne K. Chambers, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Lee Ritterband
Frances Thorndike
Lisa Nielsen
Joanne Aitken
Samantha Clutton
Paul Scuffham
Philippa Youl
Bronwyn Morris
Peter Baade
Jeffrey Dunn
Document Type
Journal Article
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
School
School of Medical and Health Sciences
RAS ID
25629
Funders
Australian National Health and Medical Research Council
Cancer Council Queensland
Grant Number
NHMRC Numbers : APP1056756, APP1054038
Abstract
Introduction:
Approximately 35% of patients with cancer experience clinically significant distress, and unmet psychological supportive care needs are prevalent. This study describes the protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of an internet-based psychological intervention for distressed patients with cancer.
Methods and analysis:
In phase I, the intervention was developed on an interactive web platform and pilot tested for acceptability using a qualitative methodology with 21 patients with cancer. Phase II is an RCT underway with patients with or at risk of elevated psychological distress comparing: (1) static patient education website with (2) individualised web-delivered cognitive behavioural intervention (CancerCope). Participants were recruited through the Queensland Cancer Registry and Cancer Council Helpline and met the following inclusion criteria: (1) recently diagnosed with cancer; (2) able to read and speak English; (3) no previous history of head injury, dementia or psychiatric illness; (4) no other concurrent cancer; (5) phone and internet access; (5) scored ≥4 on the Distress Thermometer. Participants are assessed at four time points: baseline/recruitment and 2, 6 and 12 months after recruitment and intervention commencement. Of the 163 participants recruited, 50% met caseness for distress. The area of highest unmet supportive care needs were psychological followed by physical and daily living needs. Primary outcomes are psychological and cancer-specific distress and unmet psychological supportive care needs. Secondary outcomes are positive adjustment, quality of life and cost-effectiveness.
Ethics and dissemination:
Ethical approval was obtained from the Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee (Approval: PSY/70/13/HREC) and the Metro South Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/13/QPAH/601). All participants provide informed consent prior to taking part in the study. Once completed, this study will provide recommendations about the efficacy of web-based cognitive behavioural interventions to facilitate better psychosocial adjustment for people with cancer.
Trial registration number:
ANZCTR (ACTRN12613001026718).
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017279
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
Chambers, S. K., Ritterband, L., Thorndike, F., Nielsen, L., Aitken, J. F., Clutton, S., ... & Dunn, J. (2017). A study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of an interactive web-based intervention: CancerCope. BMJ Open, 7(6), Article e017279.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017279