Ideal pictures and actual perspectives of junior secondary school science: comparisons drawn from Australian students in an astronomy education programme
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Research in Science & Technological Education
Publisher
B & S Publications
Place of Publication
United Kingdom
School
Edith Cowan Institute for Education Research
RAS ID
24822
Abstract
Background: This research investigates the impact of a junior secondary astronomy education programme undertaken in four Australian educational jurisdictions. Purpose: Junior secondary students’ perceptions of the science they experience at School are examined both before, during and after their engagement with a science programme targeting astronomy. Programme description: The programme involved using remotely controlled telescopes over the Internet. Sample: Non-randomised opportunity sampling was employed to recruit participants. Schools were drawn from both public (16) and private (14) sectors. Participants were 1427 students comprising 769 Year 7, 439 Year 8 and 219 Year 9. Design and methods: A concurrent nested mixed method approach was used to investigate the impact of the programme on students’ perceptions of science at high school. Data were collected using a pre/post questionnaire coupled with semi-structured interviews with a sample of participants. Results: Students exhibited negative perceptions of science at school prior to the commencement of the programme. Programme implementation covaried with highly significant changes in students’ perceptions of science. Conclusions: The research highlights the importance of the teacher’s role and the way in which school science is implemented as being crucial contributors to the movement of students’ perceptions.
DOI
10.1080/02635143.2017.1344959
Access Rights
subscription content
Comments
Danaia, L., McKinnon, D. H., & Fitzgerald, M. (2017). Ideal pictures and actual perspectives of junior secondary school science: comparisons drawn from Australian students in an astronomy education programme. Research in Science & Technological Education, 35(4), 445-460. Available here.