Authors
Louise R. Williams
Myzoon Ali
Kathryn VandenBerg
Linda J. Williams
Masahiro Abo
Frank Becker
Audrey Bowen
Caitlin Brandenburg
Caterina Breitenstein
Stefanie Bruehl
David A. Copland
Tamara B. Cranfill
Marie Di Pietro-Bachmann
Pamela Enderby
Joanne Fillingham
Federica Lucia Galli
Marialuisa Gandolfi
Bertrand Glize
Erin Godecke, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Neil Hawkins
Katerina Hilari
Jacqueline Hinckley
Simon Horton
David Howard
Petra Jaecks
Elizabeth Jefferies
Luis M T Jesus
Maria Kambanaros
Eun K. Kang
Eman M. Khedr
Anthony P H Kong
Tarja Kukkonen
Marina Laganaro
Matthew A. Lambon Ralph
Ann C. Laska
Béatrice Leemann
Alexander P. Leff
Roxele R. Lima
Antje Lorenz
Brian MacWhinney
Rebecca S. Marshall
Flavia Mattioli
İlknur Maviş
Marcus Meinzer
Reza Nilipour
Enrique Noé
Nam-Jong Paik
Rebecca Palmer
Ilias Papathanasiou
Brigida F. Patricio
Isabel P. Martins
Cathy Price
Tatjana P. Jakovac
Elizabeth Rochon
Miranda L. Rose
Charlotte Rosso
Ilona Rubi-Fessen
Marina B. Ruiter
Claerwen Snell
Benjamin Stahl
Jerzy P. Szaflarski
Shirley A. Thomas
Mieke Van De Sandt-Koenderman
Ineke Van Der Meulen
Evy Visch-Brink
Linda Worrall
Heather H. Wright
Marian C. Brady
The RELEASE Collaborators
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Aphasiology
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
School
School of Medical and Health Sciences
RAS ID
42759
Funders
National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research Tavistock Trust for Aphasia Chief Scientist Office Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates
Abstract
Background: Collation of aphasia research data across settings, countries and study designs using big data principles will support analyses across different language modalities, levels of impairment, and therapy interventions in this heterogeneous population. Big data approaches in aphasia research may support vital analyses, which are unachievable within individual trial datasets. However, we lack insight into the requirements for a systematically created database, the feasibility and challenges and potential utility of the type of data collated. Aim: To report the development, preparation and establishment of an internationally agreed aphasia after stroke research database of individual participant data (IPD) to facilitate planned aphasia research analyses. Methods: Data were collated by systematically identifying existing, eligible studies in any language ( ≥ 10 IPD, data on time since stroke, and language performance) and included sourcing from relevant aphasia research networks. We invited electronic contributions and also extracted IPD from the public domain. Data were assessed for completeness, validity of value-ranges within variables, and described according to pre-defined categories of demographic data, therapy descriptions, and language domain measurements. We cleaned, clarified, imputed and standardised relevant data in collaboration with the original study investigators. We presented participant, language, stroke, and therapy data characteristics of the final database using summary statistics. Results: From 5256 screened records, 698 datasets were potentially eligible for inclusion; 174 datasets (5928 IPD) from 28 countries were included, 47/174 RCT datasets (1778 IPD) and 91/174 (2834 IPD) included a speech and language therapy (SLT) intervention. Participants’ median age was 63 years (interquartile range [53, 72]), 3407 (61.4%) were male and median recruitment time was 321 days (IQR 30, 1156) after stroke. IPD were available for aphasia severity or ability overall (n = 2699; 80 datasets), naming (n = 2886; 75 datasets), auditory comprehension (n = 2750; 71 datasets), functional communication (n = 1591; 29 datasets), reading (n = 770; 12 datasets) and writing (n = 724; 13 datasets). Information on SLT interventions were described by theoretical approach, therapy target, mode of delivery, setting and provider. Therapy regimen was described according to intensity (1882 IPD; 60 datasets), frequency (2057 IPD; 66 datasets), duration (1960 IPD; 64 datasets) and dosage (1978 IPD; 62 datasets). Discussion: Our international IPD archive demonstrates the application of big data principles in the context of aphasia research; our rigorous methodology for data acquisition and cleaning can serve as a template for the establishment of similar databases in other research areas.
DOI
10.1080/02687038.2021.1897081
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
Williams, L. R., Ali, M., VandenBerg, K., Williams, L. J., Abo, M., Becker, F., . . . Brady, M. C. (2022). Utilising a systematic review-based approach to create a database of individual participant data for meta-and network meta-analyses: The RELEASE database of aphasia after stroke. Aphasiology, 36(4), 513-533. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1897081