Title

Scaling isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength in division I Athletes: are we meeting the assumptions?

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Sports Biomechanics

Publisher

Taylor and Francis

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences / Centre for Exercise and Sports Science Research

RAS ID

28635

Comments

Suchomel, T. J., Nimphius, S., & Stone, M. H. (2020). Scaling isometric mid-thigh pull maximum strength in division I Athletes: are we meeting the assumptions?. Sports Biomechanics, 19(4), 532 - 546. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2018.1498910

Abstract

This study examined the validity of various scaling methods, isometric mid-thigh pull (IMTP) peak force using various scaling methods, and the relationships between IMTP peak force and countermovement jump height. Fifty-one collegiate baseball and soccer athletes performed two maximal IMTPs. Absolute peak force was compared between teams and when data were scaled using ratio (RS), traditional allometric (ALLOTrad), and fitted allometric (ALLOFit) scaling. ALLOTrad and ALLOFit validity was violated because different derived exponents existed for baseball (b = 0.20) and soccer (b = 1.20). Soccer athletes produced greater RS peak force compared to baseball (p = 0.012), while no difference existed with absolute, ALLOTrad or ALLOFit (all p > 0.05) peak force. Moderate relationships existed between body mass and absolute (r = 0.402, p = 0.003) and RS (r = -0.328, p = 0.019) peak force, while trivial relationships existed with ALLOTrad and ALLOFit (both r < -0.10, p > 0.05). Trivial relationships existed between countermovement jump height and absolute, RS, ALLOTrad, and ALLOFit (all r < 0.20, p > 0.05) peak force. The current dataset violated allometric scaling assumptions, making it inappropriate to use ALLOTrad and ALLOFit scaling. Practitioners must understand the assumptions, limitations, and purpose of scaling methods.

DOI

10.1080/14763141.2018.1498910

Share

 
COinS