Author Identifier

Matheus D. Pinto

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2616-2492

Cody J. Wilson

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6310-8471

Anthony J. Blazevich

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1664-1614

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports

Publisher

Wiley

School

Centre for Exercise and Sports Science Research / School of Medical and Health Sciences

RAS ID

35493

Funders

Edith Cowan University - Open Access Support Scheme 2021

Comments

Pinto, M. D., Wilson, C. J., Kay, A. D., & Blazevich, A. J. (2021). Reliability of isokinetic tests of velocity‐and contraction intensity‐dependent plantar flexor mechanical properties. Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 31(5), 1009-1025. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13920

Abstract

“Flexibility” tests are traditionally performed voluntarily relaxed by rotating a joint slowly; however, functional activities are performed rapidly with voluntary/reflexive muscle activity. Here, we describe the reliabilities and differences in maximum ankle range of motion (ROMmax) and plantar flexor mechanical properties at several velocities and levels of voluntary force from a new test protocol on a commercially available dynamometer. Fifteen participants had their ankle joint dorsiflexed at 5, 30, and 60° s−1 in two conditions: voluntarily relaxed and while producing 40% and 60% of maximal eccentric torque. Commonly reported variables describing ROMmax and resistance to stretch were subsequently calculated from torque and angle data. Absolute (coefficient of variation (CV%) and typical error) and relative (ICC2,1) reliabilities were determined across two testing days (≥72 h). ROMmax relative reliability was good in voluntarily relaxed tests at 30 and 60° s−1 and moderate at 5° s−1, despite CVs ≤ 10% for all velocities. Tests performed with voluntary muscle activity were only reliable when performed at 5° s−1, and ROMmax reliability was moderate and CV ≤ 8%. For most variables, the rank order of participants differed between the slow‐velocity, relaxed test, and those performed at faster speeds or with voluntary activation, indicating different information. A person's flexibility status during voluntarily relaxed fast or active stretches tended to differ from their status in the traditional voluntarily relaxed, slow‐velocity test. Thus, “flexibility” tests should be completed under conditions of different stretch velocity and levels of muscle force production, and clinicians and researchers should consider the slightly larger between‐day variability from slow‐velocity voluntarily relaxed tests.

DOI

10.1111/sms.13920

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research Themes

Health

Share

 
COinS