Social protection policy or a political largesse: Disability fund efficacy assessment and roadblocks to sustainable development goals

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

International Journal of Public Administration

ISSN

01900692

Volume

43

Issue

15

First Page

1271

Last Page

1281

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

School

Graduate Research School

RAS ID

31369

Comments

Arkorful, V. E., Anokye, R., Basiru, I., Hammond, A., Mohammed, S., & Micah, V. B. (2020). Social protection policy or a political largesse: Disability fund efficacy assessment and roadblocks to sustainable development goals. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(15), 1271-1281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1669048

Abstract

© 2019 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. Social protection policies have been tools for fighting social exclusion, inequality and reducing poverty incidence among vulnerable populations in developing countries. In this regard, the government of Ghana through the institution of the disability fund has demonstrated a commitment to advancing the cause of people with disabilities. In assessing policy efficacy, the realities on the ground, as well as policy challenges, 130 persons with disability (PWDs) and 10 Key Informants (KIs) were recruited from across five regions. In addition to conducting face-to-face interviews with PWDs, the study conducted a number of interviews with key informants (KIs). The study findings concluded amongst other things that, the policy is plagued with challenges such as limited information about the fund, fund access difficulty and disbursement delays. It was also revealed that; the policy is saddled with opacity and partisan politics. To ensure efficiency and expedite the achievement of Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 1, the research proposed for policy restructuring. In addition to introducing financial literacy and management training for beneficiaries, the study proffers decoupling the fund management from political structures to help meet the objectives for which it was incepted.

DOI

10.1080/01900692.2019.1669048

Access Rights

subscription content

Share

 
COinS