Author Identifier

Albert Stuart Reece

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3256-720X

Gary Kenneth Hulse

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7907-0233

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Journal of Xenobiotics

Volume

13

Issue

1

First Page

42

Last Page

74

Publisher

MDPI

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

RAS ID

56481

Comments

Reece, A. S., & Hulse, G. K. (2023). Geospatiotemporal and causal inferential study of European epidemiological patterns of cannabis- and substance-related congenital orofacial anomalies. Journal of Xenobiotics, 13(1), 42-74.

https://doi.org/10.3390/jox13010006

Abstract

Introduction:

Since high rates of congenital anomalies (CAs), including facial CAs (FCAs), causally attributed to antenatal and community cannabis use have been reported in several recent series, it was of interest to examine this subject in detail in Europe.

Methods:

CA data were taken from the EUROCAT database. Drug exposure data were downloaded from the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA). Income was taken from the World Bank’s online sources.

Results:

On the bivariate maps of both orofacial clefts and holoprosencephaly against resin, the Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentration rates of both covariates increased together in France, Bulgaria, and the Netherlands. In the bivariate analysis, the anomalies could be ranked by the minimum E-value (mEV) as congenital glaucoma > congenital cataract > choanal atresia > cleft lip ± cleft palate > holoprosencephaly > orofacial clefts > ear, face, and neck anomalies. When nations with increasing daily use were compared to those without, the former had generally higher rates of FCAs (p = 0.0281). In the inverse probability weighted panel regression, the sequence of anomalies—orofacial clefts, anotia, congenital cataract, and holoprosencephaly—had positive and significant cannabis coefficients of p = 2.65 × 10−5, 1.04 × 10−8, 5.88 × 10−16, and 3.21 × 10−13, respectively. In the geospatial regression, the same series of FCAs had positive and significant regression terms for cannabis of p = 8.86 × 10−9, 0.0011, 3.36 × 10−8, and 0.0015, respectively. Some 25/28 (89.3%) E-value estimates and 14/28 (50%) mEVs were >9 (considered to be in the high range), and 100% of both were >1.25 (understood to be in the causal range).

Conclusion:

Rising cannabis use is associated with all the FCAs and fulfils the epidemiological criteria for causality. The data indicate particular concerns relating to brain development and exponential genotoxic dose-responses, urging caution with regard to community cannabinoid penetration.

DOI

10.3390/jox13010006

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Included in

Epidemiology Commons

Share

 
COinS