Changes in knee flexion-extension performance and hamstring-to-quadriceps ratio during a fatiguing isokinetic protocol in male professional futsal players

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences / Centre for Human Performance

RAS ID

60223

Comments

Machado, C. L. F., Nakamura, F. Y., Fortes, R. P., Trapaga, I. D., Brusco, C. M., Pinto, M. D., & Pinto, R. S. (2023). Changes in knee flexion-extension performance and hamstring-to-quadriceps ratio during a fatiguing isokinetic protocol in male professional futsal players. International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport. 23(4), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1080/24748668.2023.2221501

Abstract

Knee flexion (KF) and extension (KE) performance and hamstring-to-quadriceps (H:Q) ratio are used to estimate injury risk and readiness to return to sport. However, the traditional measures (i.e. non-fatigued state and by peak torque [PT]) may not reflect the thigh and knee injury conditions (i.e. high-speed actions and fatigue presence). We verified the effects of a high-speed isokinetic fatigue protocol (30 consecutive KF and KE concentric contractions at 300°/s) on KF and KE performance and H:Q ratios assessed through different parameters (i.e. PT, work, average and peak power) in male professional futsal players (n = 17). A significant (p < 0.01) time × muscle group interaction was verified. There were reductions (p < 0.01) in KF by PT (84.79 ± 15.05 to 50.29 ± 15.29 Nm), work (87.28 ± 14.46 to 39.00 ± 13.83 Nm), average power (227.81 ± 39.31 to 104.75 ± 31.24 W) and peak power (383.40 ± 59.90 to 191.39 ± 48.35 W). Similarly, KE performance decreased (p < 0.01) for all parameters (PT: 131.36 ± 16.05 to 81.61 ± 9.15 Nm; work: 148.83 ± 20.88 to 90.72 ± 11.89 Nm; average power: 148.83 ± 20.88 to 90.72 ± 11.89 W; peak power: 664.74 ± 85.32 to 398.38 ± 42.42 W). KF (−55.18 ± 13.91% to −40.94 ± 12.66%) showed a higher percentage decrease than KE (−40.46 ± 7.38% to −37.45 ± 6.61%). Finally, reductions (p < 0.01) in H:Q ratio by work, average and peak power but not by PT (p = 0.25) were verified. The tested methods can provide additional information about the athlete’s condition.

DOI

10.1080/24748668.2023.2221501

Access Rights

subscription content

Link to Full Text

Share

 
COinS