Author Identifier

Lelia Green

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4587-4679

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Media International Australia

Volume

191

Issue

1

First Page

3

Last Page

19

Publisher

SAGE

School

School of Arts and Humanities

RAS ID

61984

Funders

Edith Cowan University

Comments

This is an Authors Accepted Manuscript version of an article published by SAGE in Media International Australia. The published version is available at https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X231198317

Le, V. T., & Green, L. (2024). News frames for COVID-19 – a comparison of Australian (Australian broadcasting corporation) and Vietnamese (tuoi tre online) online news services in two key weeks in 2020. Media International Australia, 191(1), 3-19. Copyright © 2023 (SAGE).https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X231198317

Abstract

This article investigates the differences and similarities between the news frames used by online mainstream media in Vietnam and Australia when reporting COVID-19 in the early waves of the pandemic. The project uses constant comparative analysis to interrogate data gathered from two online news sources: ABC Online (Australian Broadcasting Corporation) in Australia, and Tuoi Tre Online in Vietnam. The article concludes that the Australian Broadcasting Corporation coverage focuses more on social, political and economic factors than is the case with Tuoi Tre Online, which foregrounds civic responsibility in response to the COVID-19 epidemic. The Australian Broadcasting Corporation highlights how COVID-19 amplifies the long-term consequences of social disadvantage while Tuoi Tre Online, in contrast, emphasises the short-term, acute community impacts of outbreaks, given that these require rapid identification and control. It is argued that differences between the Australian Broadcasting Corporation's and Tuoi Tre Online's framings of the pandemic reflect national differences in governance of disasters. Tuoi Tre Online perceives healthy citizenry as soldiers, and constructs the vulnerable and infected as challenges to the biological safety of the whole: the majority social collective. In contrast, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation frames vulnerable and infected individuals as important, focussing on their rights and on the responsibilities of mainstream society towards those who are at risk. © The Author(s) 2023.

DOI

10.1177/1329878X231198317

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Included in

Communication Commons

Share

 
COinS