Longitudinal development of sprint performance and force-velocity-power characteristics: Influence of biological maturation

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Volume

37

Issue

11

First Page

2178

Last Page

2184

PubMed ID

37639654

Publisher

National Strength and Conditioning Association

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

RAS ID

64647

Comments

Edwards, T., Weakley, J., Banyard, H. G., Cripps, A., Piggott, B., Haff, G. G., & Joyce, C. (2023). Longitudinal development of sprint performance and force-velocity-power characteristics: Influence of biological maturation. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 37(11), 2178-2184. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004540

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Edwards, T, Weakley, J, Banyard, HG, Cripps, A, Piggott, B, Haff, GG, and Joyce, C. Longitudinal development of sprint performance and force-velocity-power characteristics: influence of biological maturation. J Strength Cond Res 37(11): 2178-2184, 2023-This study was designed to investigate the influence of biological maturation on the longitudinal development of sprint performance. Thirty-two subjects performed 2 assessments of maximal sprint performance that were separated by 18 months. Each sprint assessment was measured through a radar gun that collected instantaneous velocity with the velocity-time data used to derive sprint times and force-velocity-power characteristics. The biological maturity of each subject was assessed using a predictive equation, and subjects were grouped according to predicted years from peak height velocity (circa-PHV: -1.0 to 1.0; post-PHV: > 1.0). A 2 × 2 mixed model analysis of variance was used to assess group × time interactions, and paired t -tests were used to assess the longitudinal changes for each maturity group. No significant group × time interactions were observed for any sprint time or force-velocity-power characteristic. The circa-PHV group experienced significant within-group changes in maximal theoretical velocity (6.35 vs. 5.47%; effect size [ES] = 1.26 vs. 0.52) and 5-m sprint time (-3.63% vs. -2.94%; ES = -0.64 vs. -0.52) compared with the post-PHV group. There was no significant change in the magnitude of relative theoretical maximum force in either group; however, both the circa-PHV and post-PHV groups significantly improved the orientation of force production at the start of the sprint (RFmax [4.91 vs. 4.46%; ES = 0.79 vs. 0.74, respectively]). Considering these findings, it is recommended that practitioners adopt training methods aimed to improve relative lower-limb force production, such as traditional strength training and sled pulling and pushing, to improve sprint performance and relative theoretical maximum force.

DOI

10.1519/JSC.0000000000004540

Access Rights

subscription content

Share

 
COinS