Kinetic analysis, potentiation, and fatigue during vertical and horizontal plyometric training: An in-depth investigation into session volume

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Volume

19

Issue

2

First Page

195

Last Page

206

PubMed ID

38134897

Publisher

Human Kinetics

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

RAS ID

64646

Comments

Watkins, C. M., Gill, N. D., McGuigan, M. R., Maunder, E., Spence, A. J., Downes, P., . . . Storey, A. G. (2023). Kinetic analysis, potentiation, and fatigue during vertical and horizontal plyometric training: An in-depth investigation into session volume. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 19(2), 195-206. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2022-0220

Abstract

Despite previous support for plyometric training, optimal dosing strategies remain unclear. PURPOSE: To investigate vertical and horizontal jump kinetic performance following a low-volume plyometric stimulus with progressively increased session jump volume. METHODS: Sixteen academy rugby players (20.0 [2.0] y; 103.0 [17.6] kg; 184.3 [5.5] cm) volunteered for this study. Vertical and horizontal jump sessions were conducted 1 week apart and consisted of a 40-jump low-volume plyometric stimulus using 4 exercises, after which volume was progressively increased to 200 jumps, using countermovement jump (CMJ) for vertical sessions and horizontal broad jump (HBJ) for horizontal sessions. Jump performance was assessed via force-plate analysis at baseline (PRE-0), following the low-volume plyometric stimulus (P-40), and every subsequent 10 jumps until the end of the session (P-50, P-60, P-70, ... P-200). RESULTS: The low-volume stimulus was effective in potentiating HBJ (2% to 5%) but not CMJ (0% to -7%) performance (P < .001). The HBJ performance enhancements were maintained throughout the entire high-volume session, while CMJ realized small but significant decrements (-5% to -7%) in jump height P-50 to P-80 before recovering to presession values. Moreover, increases in eccentric impulse (5% to 24%; P < .001) in both sessions were associated with decreased or maintained concentric impulse, indicating a breakdown in performance-augmenting mechanisms and less effective power transfer concentrically after moderate volumes. CONCLUSION: Practitioners should consider kinetic differences between HBJ and CMJ with increasing volume to better inform and understand session dosing strategies.

DOI

10.1123/ijspp.2022-0220

Access Rights

subscription content

Share

 
COinS