Conditioned pain modulation does not differ between people with lower-limb tendinopathy and nontendinopathy controls: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

Volume

54

Issue

1

First Page

50

Last Page

59

PubMed ID

37854011

Publisher

Movement Science Media

School

Nutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute / School of Medical and Health Sciences

Comments

Murphy, M. C., Mkumbuzi, N., Keightley, J., Gibson, W., Vallance, P., Riel, H., . . . Rio, E. K. (2024). Conditioned pain modulation does not differ between people with lower-limb tendinopathy and nontendinopathy controls: A systematic review with individual participant data meta-analysis. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 54(1), 50-59. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11940

Abstract

t OBJECTIVE: To explore whether people with lower-limb tendinopathy have reduced relative conditioned pain modulation (CPM) when compared to nontendinopathy controls. t DESIGN: Systematic review with individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis. t LITERATURE SEARCH: Eight databases were searched until August 29, 2022. t STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Cross-sectional studies comparing the magnitude of the CPM effect in people with lower-limb tendinopathy to nontendinopathy controls in a case-control design. t DATA SYNTHESIS: Included studies provided IPD, which was reported using descriptive statistics. Generalized estimating equations (GEEs) determined between-group differences in the relative CPM effect, when adjusting for co-variables. Study quality was assessed using a Joanna Briggs Institute checklist, and certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluations. t RESULTS: Five records were included, IPD were provided for 4 studies (n = 219 with tendinopathy, n = 226 controls). The principal GEE (model 1) found no significant relative CPM effects for tendinopathy versus controls (B = −1.73, P = .481). Sex (B = 4.11, P = .160), age (B = −0.20, P = .109), and body mass index (B = 0.28, P = .442) did not influence relative CPM effect. The Achilles region had a reduced CPM effect (B = −22.01, P = .009). In model 2 (adjusting for temperature), temperature (B = −2.86, P = .035) and female sex (B = 21.01, P = .047) were associated with the size of the relative CPM effect. All studies were low-quality, and the certainty of the evidence was moderate. t CONCLUSION: There were no between-group differences in the magnitude of the CPM effect, suggesting clinicians should manage lower-limb tendinopathy using interventions appropriate for peripherally dominant pain (eg, tendon loading exercises such as heavy slow resistance). Based on the “moderate”-certainty evidence, future studies are unlikely to substantially change these findings.

DOI

10.2519/jospt.2023.11940

Access Rights

subscription content

Share

 
COinS