Authors

Daniela Schiller
Alessandra N. C Yu
Nelly Alia-Klein
Susanne Becker
Howard C. Cromwell
Florin Dolcos
Paul J. Eslinger
Paul Frewen
Andrew H. Kemp
Edward F. Pace-Schott
Jacob Raber
Rebecca L. Silton
Elka Stefanova
Justin H. G. Williams
Nobuhito Abe
Moji Aghajani
Franziska Albrecht
Rebecca Alexander
Silke Anders
Oriana R. Aragón
Juan A. Arias
Shahar Arzy
Tatjana Aue
Sandra Baez
Michela Balconi
Tommaso Ballarini
Scott Bannister
Marlissa C. Banta
Karen C. Barrett
Catherine Belzung
Moustafa Bensafi
Linda Booij
Jamila Bookwala
Julie Boulanger-Bertolus
Sydney W. Boutros
Anne-Kathrin Bräscher
Antonio Bruno
Geraldo Busatto
Lauren M. Bylsma
Catherine Caldwell-Harris
Raymond C. K. Chan
Nicolas Cherbuin
Julian Chiarella
Pietro Cipresso
Hugo Critchley
Denise E. Croote
Heath A. Demaree
Thomas F. Denson
Brendan Depue
Birgit Derntl
Joanne M. Dickson, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Sanda Dolcos
Anat Drach-Zahavy
Olga Dubljević
Tuomas Eerola
Dan-Mikael Ellingsen
Beth Fairfield
Camille Ferdenzi
Bruce H. Friedman
Cynthia H. Y. Fu
Justine M. Gatt
Beatrice de Gelder
Guido H. E. Gendolla
Gadi Gilam
Hadass Goldblatt
Anne E. K. Gooding
Olivia Gosseries
Alfons O. Hamm
Jamie L. Hanson
Talma Hendler
Cornelia Herbert
Stefan G. Hofmann
Agustin Ibanez
Mateus Joffily
Tanja Jovanovic
Ian J. Kahrilas
Maria Kangas
Yuta Katsumi
Elizabeth Kensinger
Lauren A. J. Kirby
Rebecca Koncz
Ernst H. W. Koster
Kasia Kozlowska
Sören Krach
Mariska E. Kret
Martin Krippl
Kwabena Kusi-Mensah
Cecile D. Ladouceur
Steven Laureys
Alistair Lawrence
Chiang-shan R. Li
Belinda J. Liddell
Navdeep K. Lidhar
Christopher A. Lowry
Kelsey Magee
Marie-France Marin
Veronica Mariotti
Loren J. Martin
Hilary A. Marusak
Annalina V. Mayer
Amanda R. Merner
Jessica Minnier
Jorge Moll
Robert G. Morrison
Matthew Moore
Anne-Marie Mouly
Sven C. Mueller
Andreas Mühlberger
Nora A. Murphy
Maria R. A. Muscatello
Erica D. Musser
Tamara L. Newton
Michael Noll-Hussong
Seth D. Norrholm
Georg Northoff
Robin Nusslock
Hadas Okon-Singer
Thomas M. Olino
Catherine Ortner
Mayowa Owolabi
Caterina Padulo
Romina Palermo
Rocco Palumbo
Sara Palumbo
Christos Papadelis
Alan J. Pegna
Silvia Pellegrini
Kirsi Peltonen
Brenda W. J. H. Penninx
Pietro Pietrini
Graziano Pinna
Rosario P. Lobo
Kelly L. Polnaszek
Maryna Polyakova
Christine Rabinak
S. Helene Richter
Thalia Richter
Giuseppe Riva
Amelia Rizzo
Jennifer L. Robinson
Pedro Rosa
Perminder S. Sachdev
Wataru Sato
Matthias L. Schroeter
Susanne Schweizer
Youssef Shiban
Advaith Siddharthan
Ewa Siedlecka
Robert C. Smith
Hermona Soreq
Derek P. Spangler
Emily R. Stern
Charis Styliadis
Gavin B. Sullivan
James E. Swain
Sébastien Urben
Jan Van den Stock
Michael A. vander Kooij
Mark van Overveld
Tamsyn E. Van Rheenen
Michael B. VanElzakker
Carlos Ventura-Bort
Edelyn Verona
Tyler Volk
Yi Wang
Leah T. Weingast
Mathias Weymar
Claire Williams
Megan L. Willis
Paula Yamashita
Roland Zahn
Barbra Zupan
Leroy Lowe

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Volume

158

PubMed ID

37925091

Publisher

Elsevier

School

School of Arts and Humanities

Funders

Funding information : https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450

Grant Number

NHMRC Numbers : APP1122816, 1088785

Grant Link

http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1088785

Comments

Schiller, D., Yu, A. N. C., Alia-Klein, N., Becker, S., Cromwell, H. C., Dolcos, F., . . . Lowe, L. (2024). The human affectome. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 158, article 105450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450

Abstract

Over the last decades, theoretical perspectives in the interdisciplinary field of the affective sciences have proliferated rather than converged due to differing assumptions about what human affective phenomena are and how they work. These metaphysical and mechanistic assumptions, shaped by academic context and values, have dictated affective constructs and operationalizations. However, an assumption about the purpose of affective phenomena can guide us to a common set of metaphysical and mechanistic assumptions. In this capstone paper, we home in on a nested teleological principle for human affective phenomena in order to synthesize metaphysical and mechanistic assumptions. Under this framework, human affective phenomena can collectively be considered algorithms that either adjust based on the human comfort zone (affective concerns) or monitor those adaptive processes (affective features). This teleologically-grounded framework offers a principled agenda and launchpad for both organizing existing perspectives and generating new ones. Ultimately, we hope the Human Affectome brings us a step closer to not only an integrated understanding of human affective phenomena, but an integrated field for affective research.

DOI

10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105450

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

 
COinS