Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Molecular Genetics and Metabolism

Volume

142

Issue

1

PubMed ID

38452608

Publisher

Elsevier

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

Funders

SSADHD Natural History study / Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development grant / Boston Children's Hospital Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Centers

Comments

Latzer, I. T., Bertoldi, M., Blau, N., DiBacco, M. L., Elsea, S. H., García-Cazorla, À., . . . Pearl, P. L. (2024). Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency. Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, 142(1), article 108363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2024.108363

Abstract

Succinic semialdehyde dehydrogenase deficiency (SSADHD) (OMIM #271980) is a rare autosomal recessive metabolic disorder caused by pathogenic variants of ALDH5A1. Deficiency of SSADH results in accumulation of y-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and other GABA-related metabolites. The clinical phenotype of SSADHD includes a broad spectrum of non-pathognomonic symptoms such as cognitive disabilities, communication and language deficits, movement disorders, epilepsy, sleep disturbances, attention problems, anxiety, and obsessive-compulsive traits. Current treatment options for SSADHD remain supportive, but there are ongoing attempts to develop targeted genetic therapies. This study aimed to create consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of SSADHD. Thirty relevant statements were initially addressed by a systematic literature review, resulting in different evidence levels of strength according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. The highest level of evidence (level A), based on randomized controlled trials, was unavailable for any of the statements. Based on cohort studies, Level B evidence was available for 12 (40%) of the statements. Thereupon, through a process following the Delphi Method and directed by the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) criteria, expert opinion was sought, and members of an SSADHD Consensus Group evaluated all the statements. The group consisted of neurologists, epileptologists, neuropsychologists, neurophysiologists, metabolic disease specialists, clinical and biochemical geneticists, and laboratory scientists affiliated with 19 institutions from 11 countries who have clinical experience with SSADHD patients and have studied the disorder. Representatives from parent groups were also included in the Consensus Group. An analysis of the survey's results yielded 25 (83%) strong and 5 (17%) weak agreement strengths. These first-of-their-kind consensus guidelines intend to consolidate and unify the optimal care that can be provided to individuals with SSADHD.

DOI

10.1016/j.ymgme.2024.108363

Access Rights

subscription content

Share

 
COinS