Effects of two different low-volume resistance training programs applied during the off-season period on the speed-power performance of elite youth soccer players

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Volume

38

Issue

3

First Page

571

Last Page

576

PubMed ID

38090975

Publisher

National Strength and Conditioning Association / Wolters Kluwer

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

Comments

Loturco, I., Nunes, R. F. H., Lampert, R. R., Silva, R. L. P., Hespanhol, J. E., Novack, L. F., . . . McGuigan, M. R. (2024). Effects of two different low-volume resistance training programs applied during the off-season period on the speed-power performance of elite youth soccer players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 38(3), 571-576. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000004646

Abstract

Loturco, I, Nunes, RFH, Lampert, RR, Silva, RLP, Hespanhol, JE, Novack, LF, Conde, JHS, Pereira, LA, and McGuigan, MR. Effects of two different low-volume resistance training programs applied during the off-season period on the speed-power performance of elite youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res 38(3): 571-576, 2024 - The aim of this study was to analyze the changes in the speed-power performance of elite youth soccer players submitted to 2 different low-volume resistance training programs during the off-season period. Twenty under-17 players were randomly allocated to "traditional nonballistic" or "ballistic training" groups. Countermovement jump (CMJ), 20-m sprinting speed, and half-squat (HS) power tests were performed after the final match of the season (pretesting session) and at the beginning of the subsequent season (post-testing session), after 4 weeks of detraining. Between-group differences were assessed using a 2-way ANOVA with repeated measures followed by the Tukey's post hoc test. Performance variations were individually analyzed with the use of the "true changes" calculation. At post-tests, CMJ height and HS power remained unchanged (p > 0.05) but similar and significant improvements in sprint speed were observed in both groups (p < 0.05). However, notably, a larger number of players in the ballistic group exhibited "true changes" in HS power (i.e., 55 vs. 33%, compared with the traditional group, respectively). In conclusion, either low-volume ballistic or traditional resistance training schemes were able to increase sprint speed and maintain power output during a short interseason break in youth soccer players. Despite this apparent similarity, at the individual level, ballistic movements were more efficient at improving lower-body power. Practitioners can use the strategies described here to improve the sprint and power performance of soccer players during short periods of soccer-specific training cessation.

DOI

10.1519/JSC.0000000000004646

Access Rights

subscription content

Share

 
COinS