"An athlete's perspective: Comparing talent development environments fo" by Mikayla J. Lyons, Jenny A. Conlon et al.
 

Author Identifier

Sophia Nimphius

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3524-0245

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching

Volume

19

Issue

5

First Page

1995

Last Page

2005

Publisher

SAGE

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

RAS ID

69917

Funders

Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship

Comments

Lyons, M. L., Conlon, J. A., Nimphius, S., Keller, B. S., & Joyce, C. (2024). An athlete's perspective: Comparing talent development environments for boys and girls in Western Australia youth soccer. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 19(5), 1995-2005. https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241231363

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the perceptions of boys and girls regarding their gender-specific talent development environments (TDEs) in state-level youth soccer. Seventy-one players (girls, n = 35; boys, n = 36) aged 11–18 years completed the Talent Development Environment Questionnaire (TDEQ-5), Sports Motivation Scale (SMS-6), Coach-Athlete Relationship Questionnaire (CART-Q), and Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancies (SEOE) of strength training questionnaire. Mann–Whitney U tests and Hedges’s g effect sizes were used to identify group differences. Boys scored higher for TDEQ-5 subdimensions: long-term development focus, alignment of expectations, and holistic quality preparation. For the CART-Q, boys perceived greater coach commitment, whilst girls perceived greater coach complementarity. The SMS-6 results suggested higher amotivation among girls and higher external regulation and introjected regulation among boys. Finally, boys reported greater self-efficacy and outcome expectancies related to strength training. Overall, the findings reveal significant disparities in boys’ and girls’ perceptions of their TDEs. Whilst these findings provide a more nuanced understanding of youth soccer TDEs, further research is necessary to identify the critical factors for effective athlete development regardless of gender, or with more informed considerations of gender. Stakeholders should consider the unique constraints and resources specific to their TDE to determine which strategies may best impact their functionality.

DOI

10.1177/17479541241231363

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 4
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 32
    • Abstract Views: 10
  • Captures
    • Readers: 20
see details

Share

 
COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.