Author Identifier
Abid Hussain
https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2170-6546
Esme Franken
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6869-3155
Tim Bentley
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4721-8405
Uma Jogulu
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Labour and Industry
Volume
34
Issue
1
First Page
65
Last Page
87
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
School
School of Business and Law
RAS ID
70137
Abstract
The critical frontline work of doctors in Pakistan was overlooked and undervalued by the government, hospitals, and the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Media reports and studies highlight that public sector doctors in Pakistan facing new societal, professional, and organisational challenges, compunding to the inherent demands of workpotentially leading to its undervaluation. This study, explores how the work of doctors is (under)valued in Pakistan’s public sector hospitals, and how this aligns to the underpinnings of decent work. 27 semi structured in-depth interviews were conducted with doctors in Pakistan’s public sector hospitals. We found that serving others, recognition and appreciation, and professional learning and development were valuable aspects, whileflaws in the healthcare system, issues from patients and public, poor work environment, a lack of essential health facilities, and physical and mental health challenges associated with work were considered factors which undervalue the work for doctors. Drawing on the intersect between the concept of decent work and psychology of working theory, we establish a value framework for decent work that aligns with its psychological and sociological dimensions. Based on the findings we offer policy and practice implications ensuring the provision of decent work to public sector doctors in Pakistan.
DOI
10.1080/10301763.2024.2356366
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
Hussain, A., Franken, E., Bentley, T., & Jogulu, U. (2024). The value of work for doctors in Pakistan: towards a framework for ensuring decent work. Labour and Industry, 34(1), 65-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/10301763.2024.2356366