Effects of different conditioning activities on the sprint performance of elite sprinters: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance

Volume

19

Issue

7

First Page

712

Last Page

721

PubMed ID

38823792

Publisher

Human Kinetics

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

RAS ID

71504

Comments

Loturco, I., Pereira, L. A., Moura, T. B., McGuigan, M. R., & Boullosa, D. (2024). Effects of different conditioning activities on the sprint performance of elite sprinters: A systematic review with meta-analysis. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 19(7), 712-721. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2024-0005

Abstract

Purpose: Postactivation performance enhancement (PAPE), which refers to the phenomena associated with the attainment of enhanced performance in sport-specific tasks after a conditioning activity, is an important objective of warming-up practices in many sports. This is even more relevant for sprinters, as potential increases in sprinting speed will directly influence their competitive results. This systematic review with meta-analysis evaluated the effects of different PAPE protocols (ie, using plyometrics, strength-power exercises, and resisted/assisted sprints) on the sprinting performance (ie, sprint time or sprint speed) of competitive sprinters. Methods: Initially, 1205 records published until last December 18 were identified, using the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Clarivate Web of Science. After removing duplicates and screening titles and abstracts, 14 high-quality studies met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. Results: Overall, there were no significant changes in sprint performance after implementing various types of conditioning activities (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.16 [95% CI, -0.02 to 0.33]; Z = 1.78; P = .08; I2= 0%). In addition, when comparing prechanges and postchanges between experimental, control, and other conditions, no significant differences were found in sprint speed or time across all studies (SMD = 0.09 [95% CI, -0.10 to 0.28]; Z = 0.92; P = .36; I = 0%). Conclusions: Results revealed that different types of conditioning activities may not be capable of acutely enhancing the sprint speed of competitive sprinters. This aligns with previous observations indicating that sprinting is a highly stable physical capacity, a phenomenon that is even more consistent among elite sprinters. Coaches and sport scientists should collaborate to develop more efficient PAPE protocols for these highly specialized athletes, with special attention to study design and individualization, while considering their effects on acceleration versus top speed.

DOI

10.1123/ijspp.2024-0005

Access Rights

free_to_read

Share

 
COinS