Author Identifier

David Aldous: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1328-7245

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Sport, Education and Society

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

School

School of Education

RAS ID

75782

Comments

Alfrey, L., Scanlon, D., Aldous, D., Lorusso, J., Baker, K., Clark, C., & Jafar, M. (2024). A figurational analysis of health and/or physical education teacher educators’ conceptualisations of policy, and their sociogenesis. Sport, Education and Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2024.2408561

Abstract

Policy engagement is key to promoting quality physical education yet it has been identified as a ‘grand challenge’ for Health and/or Physical Education (H/PE) internationally. All H/PE professionals, including teacher educators, have a collective responsibility to engage with policy but existing research tells us little about how H/PE teacher educators (H/PETEs) understand and engage with policy. It is important to examine H/PETEs conceptualisations of policy for a few reasons, not least because teacher educators play a crucial role in supporting future generations of teachers who themselves will need to engage with policy as a core feature of their professional lives. Drawing on figurational sociology, and the concept of assemblage, this paper offers insights into the nature and development–or sociogenesis–of teacher educators’ conceptualisations of policy. The data shared in this paper was generated through semi-structured interviews with 12 H/PETE from 7 countries. Inductive-deductive analysis–drawing largely on figurational concepts such as interdependence, power, habitus and sociogenesis–revealed that H/PETEs conceptualised policy as: (i) informing intended action and change; (ii) a way to govern practice; (iii) imposition and possibility. In terms of how these conceptualisations came to be, key features of the H/PETE figuration that were identified as influential include: (i) interdependence with human and non-human elements; (ii) balances of power and (iii) social and individual habitus. It is concluded that capitalising on these elements through professional learning, for example, could support H/PETEs in engaging with policy in productive and meaningful ways. Given that engaging with policy is viewed as a collective responsibility of H/PETEs, and many–if not all–of the H/PETEs felt they needed support in this regard, this should be a key focus for the field.

DOI

10.1080/13573322.2024.2408561

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Share

 
COinS