Comprehensive assessment instruments for place-based sustainable agriculture: A scoping review

Authors

Rebecca Voisin, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Stephanie Godrich, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
David Blake, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Ros Sambell, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Saranne Herrington, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Janine Joyce, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Pierre Horwitz, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Amanda Devine, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow

Author Identifier

Rebecca Voisin: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8007-8240

Stephanie Godrich: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3067-8253

David Blake: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-2960

Ros Sambell: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8799-3441

Saranne Herrington: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3803-5901

Janine Joyce: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5849-5646

Pierre Horwitz: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8689-7888

Amanda Devine: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6978-6249

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Sustainability Science

Publisher

Springer

School

Centre for People, Place and Planet / School of Medical and Health Sciences / Nutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute / School of Science / School of Arts and Humanities

RAS ID

78272

Funders

Edith Cowan University

Comments

Voisin, R., Godrich, S., Blake, D., Sambell, R., Herrington, S., Joyce, J., ... & Devine, A. (2025). Comprehensive assessment instruments for place-based sustainable agriculture: A scoping review. Sustainability Science. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-025-01629-3

Abstract

A rapid transformation to sustainable agricultural production systems is necessary, requiring on-farm monitoring and measurements of key agricultural sustainability indicators. While many assessment methods for agricultural sustainability incorporate a three-pillar model of sustainability: environment, economic, and social, a step beyond this is required to support both human and planetary health. This review takes the position that a more nuanced, yet broader framing of agricultural sustainability is warranted, and identifies the measurement of additional pillars including health and nutrition, production, and responsible governance, plus overlooked aspects including Indigenous cultures. A peer-reviewed and grey literature search was conducted identifying articles (n = 8) discussing comprehensive, more than three-pillar, on-farm sustainability assessment instruments (n = 7). These seven instruments were analysed against an a priori framework of adaptability, modularity, practicality and scalability. Also explored was the usage of the broader sustainability pillars and common themes within the literature. Limited literature was found which encompassed the complexity of the requirements for measuring agricultural sustainability on-farm. A scalable and practical approach to the construction and use of on-farm agricultural sustainability assessment instruments is nascent. This review recommends the examination of instruments in a participatory and transdisciplinary manner to ensure effective operationalisation, acknowledge place-based nuance, and support farmers as potential end-users. Moving forward, the application and design of sustainable agriculture assessment instruments needs to encompass the full range of externalities created by agricultural production systems to actualise sustainability.

DOI

10.1007/s11625-025-01629-3

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.