Author Identifier

Janet L. Taylor: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8976-5162

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Journal of Neurophysiology

Volume

133

Issue

2

First Page

447

Last Page

463

PubMed ID

39718492

Publisher

American Physiological Society

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

Funders

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia / SpinalCure Australia / CatWalk New Zealand / Joan Hume Post-Doctoral Award from Neuroscience Research Australia

Comments

Finn, H. T., Parono, M., Bye, E. A., Taylor, J. L., Gandevia, S. C., Héroux, M. E., & Butler, J. E. (2025). Differential effects of stimulation waveform and intensity on the neural structures activated by lumbar transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation. Journal of Neurophysiology, 133(2), 447-463. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00266.2024

Abstract

Lumbar transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSS) evokes synchronized muscle responses, termed spinally evoked motor response (sEMR). Whether the structures TSS activates to evoke sEMRs differ when TSS intensity and waveform are varied is unknown. In 15 participants (9 F, 6 M), sEMRs were evoked by TSS over L1–L3 (at sEMR threshold and suprathreshold intensities) with conventional (one 400-ls biphasic pulse) or high-frequency burst (ten 40-ls biphasic pulses at 10 kHz) stimulus waveforms in vastus medialis (VM), tibialis anterior (TA), and medial gastrocnemius (MG) muscles. TSS was paired with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the contralateral motor cortex at relative interstimulus intervals (ISIs) (−10 ms to 11 ms), centered on the ISI when TSS and TMS inputs simultaneously activated VM motoneurons. Doublet TSS was delivered at 80-ms ISI. For VM, the area of the combined response evoked by paired TMS and TSS was not facilitated at any ISI. For TA and MG, combined responses were facilitated by ∼40–100% when TMS activated the motoneurons before or at a similar time as TSS, particularly with suprathreshold TSS. Additionally, for TA, there was greater suppression of the second sEMR evoked by TSS doublets using suprathreshold conventional TSS compared to high-frequency burst TSS (P < 0.001). The results suggest that for VM TSS activated predominantly motor axons, but for TA and MG facilitation of the sEMR by TMS suggests that TSS activated sensory axons. Stimulation waveforms had similar outcomes in most conditions.

DOI

10.1152/jn.00266.2024

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Download

Included in

Neurosciences Commons

Share

 
COinS