Author Identifier
Weiting Liu: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6936-8872
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Journal of Integrative Medicine
Volume
23
Issue
2
First Page
113
Last Page
125
PubMed ID
40097324
Publisher
Elsevier
School
School of Nursing and Midwifery
Publication Unique Identifier
10.1016/j.joim.2025.02.004
Abstract
Background: Acupuncture is widely used in modulating brain excitability and motor function, as a form of complementary and alternative medicine. However, there is no existing meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture on corticospinal excitability (CSE), and the credibility of the evidence has yet to be quantified. Objective: This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of electroacupuncture (EA) and manual acupuncture (MA) in enhancing brain excitability, specifically focusing on CSE as measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Search strategy: This study followed a systematic approach, searching 9 databases up to August 2024 and examining grey literature, in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria: Studies were included if they compared the clinical efficacy of EA or MA with sham acupuncture, no treatment or usual training. Data extraction and analysis: Three investigators independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The primary outcome focused on motor-evoked potentials as measured by TMS, with treatment effects quantified using mean differences or standardized mean differences between pre- and post-treatment. Subgroup analyses were conducted using mixed-effects models, while random-effects or fixed-effects models were used to estimate average treatment differences across studies. Results: Based on 34 studies involving 1031 adults, acupuncture techniques significantly enhanced CSE. EA had a greater impact than MA, with effect sizes of 0.53 mV vs 0.43 mV (95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.30, 0.76], P < 0.00001 vs 95% CI: [0.28, 0.59], P < 0.00001). The 5 most frequently used acupoints were LI4 (Hegu, 32 times), ST36 (Zusanli, 10 times), LI11 (Quchi, 7 times), TE5 (Waiguan, 6 times), and GB34 (Yanglingquan, 5 times). Conclusion: This systematic review indicates that both EA and MA could effectively and safely enhance CSE, bringing the corticospinal pathway closer to the threshold for firing, which may ultimately improve motor function. LI4, ST36, LI11, TE5 and GB34 are the most commonly used acupoints. Please cite this article as: Liu R, Moe AAK, Liu W, Zoghi M, Jaberzadeh S. Does acupuncture at motor-related acupoints affect corticospinal excitability? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Integr Med. 2025; 23(2): 113–125.
DOI
10.1016/j.joim.2025.02.004
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
Liu, R., Moe, A. A. K., Liu, W., Zoghi, M., & Jaberzadeh, S. (2025). Does acupuncture at motor-related acupoints affect corticospinal excitability? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Integrative Medicine, 23(2), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joim.2025.02.004