Author Identifier
Miriam Sullivan: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9870-2734
Document Type
Editorial
Publication Title
Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice
Volume
22
Issue
1
Publisher
Open Access Publishing Association
School
Centre for Learning and Teaching
Publication Unique Identifier
10.53761/2qgq0714
Abstract
The differences between regularly published practice papers and evidence-based Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) manuscripts as preferred publications are outlined and discussed in this editorial. By examining the literature and backstory of SoTL, clear guidelines for well-designed research studies supported by evidence provide compelling reasons for SoTL papers to contribute to international knowledge, change thinking, advance practice in higher education and meet the aims of scholarly academic journal. The types of evidence that can be used are described, and a practical checklist for authors to benchmark their manuscript against SoTL principles is also offered as a hands-on tool for improving manuscript submissions. Studies based on evidence and scholarship establish credible, valid, and current knowledge through defensible theoretical frameworks and systematic methodology. Scholarly studies not only contribute to knowledge, improve practice, advance pedagogy, and inform policy but also drive significant change in international higher education contexts.
DOI
10.53761/2qgq0714
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.
Comments
Ashton-Hay, S., Coleman, B., Sullivan, M., & Toquero, C. M. (2025). The difference in practice papers and scholarship: We publish the latter. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/2qgq0714