Author Identifier (ORCID)

Tashi Dorji: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6074-9062

Angus Morrison-Saunders: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3560-0164

David Blake: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3747-2960

Abstract

Bhutan’s development philosophy of Gross National Happiness (GNH) prioritises the collective wellbeing of its people over economic growth through a multidimensional index that informs policy. While GNH has received global recognition, persistent challenges in conceptual clarity and practical implementation are argued and debated. This qualitative study examines the role and utility of GNH as a development model and its implementation as a multifaceted governance tool in Bhutan. The findings reveal that GNH is conceptualised in diverse ways, ranging from personal happiness to a more generic communal philosophy. While its strengths lie in its culturally grounded framework, key limitations include a lack of shared understanding, overuse in marketing, and tensions with economic growth. As a governance tool, its implementation is challenged by inconsistent political commitment, limited resources, and reliance on informal cultural practices, rather than official policy instruments. The study concludes that for GNH to mature into an effective and replicable alternative development paradigm, Bhutan must address these implementation gaps through legislative formalisation, simplified public communication, and strategies that reconcile its wellbeing objectives with economic imperatives.

Document Type

Journal Article

Date of Publication

2025

Volume

1

Issue

1

Publication Title

Bhutan Insights

Publisher

EduPlus Training Institute

School

School of Science / Centre for People, Place and Planet

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

Comments

Dorji, T., Morrison-Saunders, A., & Blake, D. (2025). Implementing gross national happiness in Bhutan as a development model and governance tool–Perspectives of policy influencers. Bhutan Insights, 1(1), 29-39.

First Page

29

Last Page

39

Share

 
COinS