Author Identifier (ORCID)
Abid Hussain: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-2170-6546
Esme Franken: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6869-3155
Abstract
While meaningful work is widely recognised as a driver of job satisfaction, the role of leadership style and bureaucratic constraints in shaping this relationship remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap by investigating how laissez-faire leadership and red tape moderate the meaningful work–job satisfaction relationship among Australian public sector employees (N = 277). The findings reveal that laissez-faire leadership strengthens this relationship, suggesting that the autonomy it provides enhances the benefits of meaningful work, contrary to its traditionally negative portrayal. In contrast, red tape significantly weakens the relationship, highlighting the adverse effects of bureaucratic inefficiencies. These results confirm that meaningful work is a strong predictor of job satisfaction, but its impact is highly dependent on organisational context. Given the occupational composition of the sample, the findings are most applicable to public sector roles characterised by higher discretion and autonomy. By challenging conventional views of laissez-faire leadership as detrimental, this study contributes to leadership and public administration research, demonstrating that its effects can be contingent on work meaningfulness and job autonomy. The findings emphasise the need for public sector reforms to reduce bureaucratic constraints and develop leadership approaches that balance autonomy with structured support. Future research should further explore these dynamics across diverse occupational groups and governance contexts for broader applicability and to refine leadership and organisational policies. Points for practitioners: Laissez-faire leadership can enhance job satisfaction when meaningful work is present; therefore, public sector leaders should consider providing employees with greater autonomy and flexibility, especially when tasks are intrinsically motivating. Red tape erodes the positive effects of meaningful work, so reforms aimed at streamlining processes and reducing administrative burdens are essential. Promoting meaningful work by aligning organisational objectives with employees’ personal and societal values can significantly boost job satisfaction, especially in sectors like public service where mission alignment is crucial. While laissez-faire leadership may work well in certain environments, managers should balance autonomy with appropriate support to maximise job satisfaction and engagement.
Document Type
Journal Article
Date of Publication
1-1-2025
Publication Title
Australian Journal of Public Administration
Publisher
Wiley
School
School of Business and Law
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
Comments
Hussain, A., & Franken, E. (2025). Laissez‐faire leadership, red tape and the meaningful work paradox. Australian Journal of Public Administration. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.70019