Author Identifier (ORCID)

Steven D’Alessandro: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-232X

Abstract

This research focuses on decision-making by trustees of self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) in Australia. Behavioral attributes are examined using the four-quadrant model (FQM) developed by Lovric et al. (2010), comprising the cognitive, affective, controlled, and automatic quadrants. The FQM integrates two closely related dual-process theories (DPT). Both the DPT framework and the FQM draw on foundational principles from the cognitive and behavioral sciences. The result of the mixed methods study uses the FQM to explain investment decision-making. The dataset was examined using cluster analysis to identify underlying group structures, followed by regression modelling to assess the relationships between key variables. The model can also predict trustees who seek investment advice and those who act independently. The FQM was also associated with different styles of investment decision-making by the SMSF trustees and investors. Under the model, trustees and investors are classified as active or passive investors. A key finding of the research is that investment decision-making often includes emotions and feelings as overriding influences and nonrational behavior can, and does determine investment decisions.

Keywords

Investment decision making, behavioral finance, self managed super funds, dual process theory, cluster analysis, investor behavior

Document Type

Journal Article

Date of Publication

3-31-2026

Volume

34

Issue

1

Publication Title

Financial Services Review

Publisher

Academy of Financial Services

School

School of Business and Law

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 License

Comments

Colbeck, R., D’Alessandro, S., & Minas, J. (2026). Using the four-quadrant model of think/feel/fast/ slow to understand the decision-making of self-managed superannuation fund trustees. Financial Services Review, 34(1), 43–69. https://doi.org/10.61190/zsy7wg09

First Page

43

Last Page

69

Download

Share

 
COinS
 

Link to publisher version (DOI)

10.61190/zsy7wg09