Voluntary activation of knee extensor muscles with transcranial magnetic stimulation

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Journal of Applied Physiology

Volume

130

Issue

3

First Page

589

Last Page

604

PubMed ID

33270515

Publisher

American Physiological Society

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

RAS ID

35664

Funders

National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

Grant Number

NHMRC Number : 1055084

Comments

Nuzzo, J. L., Kennedy, D. S., Finn, H. T., & Taylor, J. L. (2021). Voluntary activation of knee extensor muscles with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Applied Physiology, 130(3), 589-604. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00717.2020

Abstract

We examined if transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a valid tool for assessment of voluntary activation of the knee extensors in healthy individuals. Maximal M-waves (Mmax) of vastus lateralis (VL) were evoked with electrical stimulation of femoral nerve (FNS); Mmax of medial hamstrings (HS) was evoked with electrical stimulation of sciatic nerve branches; motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of VL and HS were evoked with TMS; superimposed twitches (SIT) of knee extensors were evoked with FNS and TMS. In study 1, TMS intensity [69% output (SD: 5)] was optimized for MEP sizes, but guidelines for test validity could not be met. Agonist VL MEPs were too small [51.4% Mmax (SD: 11.9); guideline ≥ 70% Mmax] and antagonist HS MEPs were too big [16.5% Mmax (SD: 10.3); guideline < 10% Mmax]. Consequently, the TMS estimated resting twitch [99.1 N (SD: 37.2)] and FNS resting twitch [142.4 N (SD: 41.8)] were different. In study 2, SITs at 90% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) were similar between TMS [16.1 N (SD: 10.3)] and FNS [20.9 N (SD: 16.7)], when TMS intensity was optimized for this purpose, suggesting a procedure that combines TMS SITs with FNS resting twitches could be valid. In study 3, which tested the TMS intensity [56% output (SD: 18)] that evoked the largest SIT at 90% MVC, voluntary activation from TMS [87.3% (SD: 7.1)] and FNS [84.5% (SD: 7.6)] was different. In sum, the contemporary procedure for TMS-based voluntary activation of the knee extensors is invalid. A modified procedure improves validity but only in individuals who meet rigorous inclusion criteria for SITs and MEPs.NEW & NOTEWORTHY We discovered that the contemporary procedure for assessing voluntary activation of the knee extensor muscles with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is invalid. TMS activates too few agonist quadriceps motoneurons and too many antagonist hamstrings motoneurons to estimate the resting twitch accurately. A modified procedure, in which TMS-evoked superimposed twitches are considered together with the resting twitch from femoral nerve stimulation, is valid but only in select individuals who meet rigorous eligibility criteria.

DOI

10.1152/japplphysiol.00717.2020

Access Rights

subscription content

Share

 
COinS