The effect of low-volume preseason plyometric training on force-velocity profiles in semiprofessional rugby union players

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Volume

35

Issue

3

First Page

604

Last Page

615

PubMed ID

33395182

Publisher

Wolters Kluwer

School

School of Medical and Health Sciences

RAS ID

39669

Comments

Watkins, C. M., Gill, N. D., Maunder, E., Downes, P., Young, J. D., McGuigan, M. R., & Storey, A. G. (2021). The effect of low-volume preseason plyometric training on force-velocity profiles in semiprofessional rugby union players. The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 35(3), 604-615. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000003917

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Watkins, CM, Gill, ND, Maunder, E, Downes, P, Young, JD, McGuigan, MR, and Storey, AG. The effect of low-volume preseason plyometric training on force-velocity profiles in semiprofessional rugby union players. J Strength Cond Res 35(3): 604-615, 2021-Rugby union is a physically demanding and complex team sport requiring athletes across all positions to express speed and acceleration. Plyometrics can effectively improve speed profiles by enhancing both force- and velocity-(FV) characteristics; however, the optimal dose and exercise direction for trained athletes is still relatively unknown. Therefore, the aim of this investigation was to determine the efficacy of a low-dose, directionally specific plyometric training program for improving speed profiles in semiprofessional rugby players. Players were randomly allocated to one of 2 plyometric training groups that performed low-volume (40-60 ground contacts per session) plyometrics twice weekly, or a control group that did not participate in any plyometric training. The 2 training groups underwent reverse back-to-back three-week vertically and horizontally focused plyometric training programs, with a 12-day washout. Body composition, aerobic capacity, and sprint performance (10-, 20-, 30-m split time, horizontal FV profile) were measured. During the intervention, HV-1 (horizontal/vertical training group 1) improved sprint performance (n = 12; ∆30 m = -0.020 seconds; p = 0.038), VH-2 (vertical/horizontal training group 2) maintained sprint performance (n = 8; ∆30 m = +0.049 seconds; p = 0.377), and the control group progressively declined in sprint performance (n = 12; ∆30 m = +0.071; p = 0.019). In addition, vertical plyometrics may preferentially benefit secondary acceleration (∆10-20 m split time: -0.01 seconds; p = 0.03) and many force-oriented FV profile characteristics. Correlational analyses (r2 = -0.568 to 0.515) showed sprint improvements were hindered in athletes with lower initial aerobic fitness, suggesting accumulated fatigue may have limited the magnitude of adaptation. Therefore, including low-volume plyometric training may be beneficial for improving sprint profiles or attenuating decrements realized during periods of high-volume sport-specific training.

DOI

10.1519/JSC.0000000000003917

Access Rights

subscription content

Share

 
COinS