Antimicrobial resistance surveillance of Clostridioides difficile in Australia, 2015-18
Authors/Creators
- Papanin Putsathit, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
- Stacey Hong
- Narelle George
- Christine Hemphill
- Peter G. Huntington
- Tony M. Korman
- Despina Kotsanas
- Monica Lahra
- Rodney McDougall
- Andrew McGlinchey
- Casey V. Moore
- Graeme R. Nimmo
- Louise Prendergast
- Jennifer Robson
- Lynette Waring
- Michael C. Wehrhahn
- Gerhard F. Weldhagen
- Richard M. Wilson
- Thomas V. Riley, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
- Daniel R. Knight
Abstract
Background: Clostridioides difficile was listed as an urgent antimicrobial resistance (AMR) threat in a report by the CDC in 2019. AMR drives the evolution of C. difficile and facilitates its emergence and spread. The C. difficile Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance (CDARS) study is nationwide longitudinal surveillance of C. difficile infection (CDI) in Australia. Objectives: To determine the antimicrobial susceptibility of C. difficile isolated in Australia between 2015 and 2018. Methods: A total of 1091 strains of C. difficile were collected over a 3 year period by a network of 10 diagnostic microbiology laboratories in five Australian states. These strains were tested for their susceptibility to nine antimicrobials using the CLSI agar incorporation method. Results: All strains were susceptible to metronidazole, fidaxomicin, rifaximin and amoxicillin/clavulanate and low numbers of resistant strains were observed for meropenem (0.1%; 1/1091), moxifloxacin (3.5%; 38/1091) and vancomycin (5.7%; 62/1091). Resistance to clindamycin was common (85.2%; 929/1091), followed by resistance to ceftriaxone (18.8%; 205/1091). The in vitro activity of fidaxomicin [geometric mean MIC (GM)=0.101 mg/L] was superior to that of vancomycin (1.700 mg/L) and metronidazole (0.229 mg/L). The prevalence of MDR C. difficile, as defined by resistance to ≥ 3 antimicrobial classes, was low (1.7%; 19/1091). Conclusions: The majority of C. difficile isolated in Australia did not show reduced susceptibility to antimicrobials recommended for treatment of CDI (vancomycin, metronidazole and fidaxomicin). Resistance to carbapenems and fluoroquinolones was low and MDR was uncommon; however, clindamycin resistance was frequent. One fluoroquinolone-resistant ribotype 027 strain was detected.
Keywords
antimicrobial resistance surveillance, Clostridioides difficile, AMR, infection
Document Type
Journal Article
Date of Publication
2021
Volume
76
Issue
7
PubMed ID
33895826
Publication Title
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Publisher
Oxford University Press
School
School of Medical and Health Sciences
RAS ID
35710
Funders
Raine Medical Research Foundation National Health and Medical Research Council
Grant Number
NHMRC Number : APP1138257
Grant Link
http://purl.org/au-research/grants/nhmrc/1138257
Copyright
free_to_read
First Page
1815
Last Page
1821
Comments
Putsathit, P., Hong, S., George, N., Hemphill, C., Huntington, P. G., Korman, T. M., ... Knight, D. R. (2021). Antimicrobial resistance surveillance of Clostridioides difficile in Australia, 2015–18. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 76(7), 1815-1821. https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkab099