Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Journal of Hydroinformatics
Volume
23
Issue
5
First Page
1030
Last Page
1049
Publisher
IWA Publishing
School
School of Engineering
RAS ID
39722
Abstract
The accurate prediction of the mean wave overtopping rate at breakwaters is vital for a safe design. Hence, providing a robust tool as a preliminary estimator can be useful for practitioners. Recently, soft computing tools such as artificial neural networks (ANN) have been developed as alternatives to traditional overtopping formulae. The goal of this paper is to assess the capabilities of two kernel-based methods, namely Gaussian process regression (GPR) and support vector regression for the prediction of mean wave overtopping rate at sloped breakwaters. An extensive dataset taken from the EurOtop database, including rubble mound structures with permeable core, straight slopes, without berm, and crown wall, was employed to develop the models. Different combinations of the important dimensionless parameters representing structural features and wave conditions were tested based on the sensitivity analysis for developing the models. The obtained results were compared with those of the ANN model and the existing empirical formulae. The modified Taylor diagram was used to compare the models graphically. The results showed the superiority of kernel-based models, especially the GPR model over the ANN model and empirical formulae. In addition, the optimal input combination was introduced based on accuracy and the number of input parameters criteria. Finally, the physical consistencies of developed models were investigated, the results of which demonstrated the reliability of kernel-based models in terms of delivering physics of overtopping phenomenon.
DOI
10.2166/hydro.2021.046
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
Hosseinzadeh, S., Etemad-Shahidi, A., & Koosheh, A. (2021). Prediction of mean wave overtopping at simple sloped breakwaters using kernel-based methods. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 23(5), 1030-1049. https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2021.046