ICON 2020—international scientific tendinopathy symposium consensus: A systematic review of outcome measures reported in clinical trials of achilles tendinopathy
Authors/Creators
- Karin Grävare Silbernagel
- Peter Malliaras
- Robert-Jan de Vos
- Shawn Hanlon
- Mitchel Molenaar
- Håkan Alfredson
- Inge van den Akker-Scheek
- Jarrod Antflick
- Mathijs van Ark
- Kenneth Färnqvist
- Zubair Haleem
- Jean-Francois Kaux
- Paul Kirwan
- Bhavesh Kumar
- Trevor Lewis
- Adrian Mallows
- Lorenzo Masci
- Dylan Morrissey
- Myles Murphy, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
- Richard Newsham-West
- Richard Norris, Edith Cowan University
- Seth O’Neill
- Koen Peers
- Igor Sancho
- Kayla Seymore
- Patrick Vallance
- Arco van der Vlist
- Bill Vicenzino
Abstract
Background:
Nine core domains for tendinopathy have been identified. For Achilles tendinopathy there is large variation in outcome measures used, and how these fit into the core domains has not been investigated.
Objective:
To identify all available outcome measures outcome measures used to assess the clinical phenotype of Achilles tendinopathy in prospective studies and to map the outcomes measures into predefined health-related core domains.
Design: Systematic review. Data Sources:
Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy, sample size ≥ ten participants, age ≥ 16 years, and the study design was a randomized or non-randomized clinical trial, observational cohort, single-arm intervention, or case series.
Results:
9376 studies were initially screened and 307 studies were finally included, totaling 13,248 participants. There were 233 (177 core domain) different outcome measures identified across all domains. For each core domain outcome measures were identified, with a range between 8 and 35 unique outcome measures utilized for each domain. The proportion of studies that included outcomes for predefined core domains ranged from 4% for the psychological factors domain to 72% for the disability domain. Conclusion: 233 unique outcome measures for Achilles tendinopathy were identified. Most frequently, outcome measures were used within the disability domain. Outcome measures assessing psychological factors were scarcely used. The next step in developing a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy is to engage patients, clinicians and researchers to reach consensus on key outcomes measures.
Prospero Registration: CRD42020156763.
Keywords
International scientific tendinopathy symposium consensus, systematic review, outcome measures, clinical trials, Achilles Tendinopathy
Document Type
Journal Article
Date of Publication
3-2022
Publication Title
Sports Medicine
Publisher
Springer
School
School of Medical and Health Sciences
RAS ID
42687
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Copyright
subscription content
First Page
613
Last Page
641
Comments
Grävare Silbernagel, K., Malliaras, P., de Vos, R. J., Hanlon, S., Molenaar, M., Alfredson, H., . . . Vicenzino, B. (2022). ICON 2020—international scientific tendinopathy symposium consensus: A systematic review of outcome measures reported in clinical trials of achilles tendinopathy. Sports Medicine, 52, 613-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01588-6