ICON 2020—international scientific tendinopathy symposium consensus: A systematic review of outcome measures reported in clinical trials of achilles tendinopathy
Authors/Creators
Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Peter Malliaras
Robert-Jan de Vos
Shawn Hanlon
Mitchel Molenaar
Håkan Alfredson
Inge van den Akker-Scheek
Jarrod Antflick
Mathijs van Ark
Kenneth Färnqvist
Zubair Haleem
Jean-Francois Kaux
Paul Kirwan
Bhavesh Kumar
Trevor Lewis
Adrian Mallows
Lorenzo Masci
Dylan Morrissey
Myles Murphy, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Richard Newsham-West
Richard Norris, Edith Cowan University
Seth O’Neill
Koen Peers
Igor Sancho
Kayla Seymore
Patrick Vallance
Arco van der Vlist
Bill Vicenzino
Abstract
Background:
Nine core domains for tendinopathy have been identified. For Achilles tendinopathy there is large variation in outcome measures used, and how these fit into the core domains has not been investigated.
Objective:
To identify all available outcome measures outcome measures used to assess the clinical phenotype of Achilles tendinopathy in prospective studies and to map the outcomes measures into predefined health-related core domains.
Design: Systematic review. Data Sources:
Embase, MEDLINE (Ovid), Web of Science, CINAHL, The Cochrane Library, SPORTDiscus and Google Scholar. Eligibility Criteria for Selecting Studies: Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy, sample size ≥ ten participants, age ≥ 16 years, and the study design was a randomized or non-randomized clinical trial, observational cohort, single-arm intervention, or case series.
Results:
9376 studies were initially screened and 307 studies were finally included, totaling 13,248 participants. There were 233 (177 core domain) different outcome measures identified across all domains. For each core domain outcome measures were identified, with a range between 8 and 35 unique outcome measures utilized for each domain. The proportion of studies that included outcomes for predefined core domains ranged from 4% for the psychological factors domain to 72% for the disability domain. Conclusion: 233 unique outcome measures for Achilles tendinopathy were identified. Most frequently, outcome measures were used within the disability domain. Outcome measures assessing psychological factors were scarcely used. The next step in developing a core outcome set for Achilles tendinopathy is to engage patients, clinicians and researchers to reach consensus on key outcomes measures.
Prospero Registration: CRD42020156763.
RAS ID
42687
Document Type
Journal Article
Date of Publication
3-2022
Funding Information
National Institutes of Health
School
School of Medical and Health Sciences
Copyright
subscription content
Publisher
Springer
Recommended Citation
Grävare Silbernagel, K., Malliaras, P., de Vos, R., Hanlon, S., Molenaar, M., Alfredson, H., van den Akker-Scheek, I., Antflick, J., van Ark, M., Färnqvist, K., Haleem, Z., Kaux, J., Kirwan, P., Kumar, B., Lewis, T., Mallows, A., Masci, L., Morrissey, D., Murphy, M., Newsham-West, R., Norris, R., O’Neill, S., Peers, K., Sancho, I., Seymore, K., Vallance, P., van der Vlist, A., & Vicenzino, B. (2022). ICON 2020—international scientific tendinopathy symposium consensus: A systematic review of outcome measures reported in clinical trials of achilles tendinopathy. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01588-6
Comments
Grävare Silbernagel, K., Malliaras, P., de Vos, R. J., Hanlon, S., Molenaar, M., Alfredson, H., . . . Vicenzino, B. (2022). ICON 2020—international scientific tendinopathy symposium consensus: A systematic review of outcome measures reported in clinical trials of achilles tendinopathy. Sports Medicine, 52, 613-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-021-01588-6