Document Type
Journal Article
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
School
School of Education
RAS ID
21709
Abstract
In this paper we argue that comparative judgement delivered by online technologies is a viable, valid and highly reliable alternative to traditional analytical marking. In the past, comparative judgement has been underused in educational assessment and measurement, particularly in large-scale testing, mainly due to the lack of supporting technologies to facilitate the large number of judgements and judges. We describe the foundations of comparative judgement and dispel many of the old issues regarding its use in regards to time, cost and training for large-scale assessment. Studies in the use of comparative judgement and online technologies for the assessment and measurement of practical performance conducted by Edith Cowan University provide a context for further promoting its use in educational testing.
DOI
10.1186/s41239-016-0018-x
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
Tarricone, P., & Newhouse, C. P. (2016). Using comparative judgement and online technologies in the assessment and measurement of creative performance and capability. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0018-x