Authors’ reply to buckner et al.: ‘Comment on: “The general adaptation syndrome: A foundation for the concept of periodization”
Authors
Aaron J. Cunanan
Brad H. Deweese
John P. Wagle
Kevin M. Carroll
Robert Sausaman
W. Guy Hornsby
G. Gregory Haff, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
N. Travis Triplett
Kyle C. Pierce
Michael H. Stone
Document Type
Letter to the Editor
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
School
Centre for Exercise and Sports Science Research / School of Medical and Health Sciences
Abstract
Buckner et al. [1] have submitted a letter in response to our recent review [2] on the general adaptation syndrome (GAS) and its application to training periodization. As Buckner et al. state, this topic deserves fair and thorough discussion from multiple perspectives, and we thank them for the opportunity to continue such dialogue. Their letter restates many of the points in their original reviews [3, 4], which we addressed in our manuscript. Nevertheless, we will address the main points of their letter to provide further clarity on how the GAS does in fact serve as an appropriate mechanistic model to conceptualize training periodization.
DOI
10.1007/s40279-018-0884-6
Access Rights
subscription content
Comments
Cunanan, A. J., DeWeese, B. H., Wagle, J. P., Carroll, K. M., Sausaman, R., Hornsby, W. G.,III, . . . Stone, M. H. (2018). Authors’ reply to buckner et al.: ‘Comment on: “The general adaptation syndrome: A foundation for the concept of periodization”. Sports Medicine, 48(7), 1755-1757. Available here