Cardiotocography vs. intermittent auscultation in assessing fetal well-being

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

American Journal of Nursing

Publisher

Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

School

School of Nursing and Midwifery

Comments

Bayes, S., & Whitehead, L. (2018). Cardiotocography vs. intermittent auscultation in assessing fetal well-being. American Journal of Nursing, 118(6), 23. Available here

Abstract

REVIEW QUESTION Which method of monitoring fetal heart rate— cardiotocography or intermittent auscultation—leads to better outcomes for mothers and newborns?

TYPE OF REVIEW A systematic review of four trials involving more than 13,000 women.

DOI

10.1097/01.NAJ.0000534845.27761.cc

Access Rights

subscription content

Share

 
COinS