Title

Cardiotocography vs. intermittent auscultation in assessing fetal well-being

Document Type

Journal Article

Publisher

Lippincott Williams and Wilkins

School

School of Nursing and Midwifery

Comments

Originally published as: Bayes, S., & Whitehead, L. (2018). Cardiotocography vs. intermittent auscultation in assessing fetal well-being. American Journal of Nursing, 118(6), 23. Original article available here

Abstract

REVIEW QUESTION Which method of monitoring fetal heart rate— cardiotocography or intermittent auscultation—leads to better outcomes for mothers and newborns?

TYPE OF REVIEW A systematic review of four trials involving more than 13,000 women.

DOI

10.1097/01.NAJ.0000534845.27761.cc

Share

 
COinS