Estimating the health and socioeconomic effects of cousin marriage in South Asia
Authors
A. Mushfiq Mobarak
Theresa Chaudhry
Julia Brown
Tetyana Zelenska
M. Nizam Khan
Shamyla Chaudry
Rana Abdul Wajid
Alan H. Bittles, Edith Cowan UniversityFollow
Steven Li
Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
Journal of Biosocial Science
ISSN
1469-7599
Volume
51
Issue
3
First Page
418
Last Page
435
PubMed ID
30289091
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
School
School of Medical and Health Sciences
RAS ID
29741
Funders
Funding information available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932018000275
Abstract
The effects of marriage between biological relatives on the incidence of childhood genetic illness and mortality are of major policy significance, as rates of consanguinity exceed 50% in various countries. Empirical research on this question is complicated by the fact that consanguinity is often correlated with poverty and other unobserved characteristics of households, which may have independent effects on mortality. This study has developed an instrumental variables empirical strategy to re-examine this question, based on the concept that the availability of unmarried cousins of the opposite gender at the time of marriage creates quasi-random variation in the propensity to marry consanguineously. Using primary data collected in Bangladesh in 2006-07 and Pakistan in 2009-10, the study found that previous estimates of the impact of consanguinity on child health were biased and falsely precise. The study also empirically investigated the social and economic causes of consanguinity (including marital quality) and concludes that marrying a cousin can have positive economic effects for one's natal family, by allowing deferral of dowry payments until after marriage.
DOI
10.1017/S0021932018000275
Access Rights
subscription content
Comments
Mobarak, A. M., Chaudhry, T., Brown, J., Zelenska, T., Khan, M. N., Chaudry, S., ... Li, S. (2019). Estimating the health and socioeconomic effects of cousin marriage in South Asia. Journal of Biosocial Science, 51(3), 418-435. Available here