Author Identifier

Abdellah Shafieian (Dastjerdi)

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3012-8887

Mehdi Khiadani

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1703-9342

Document Type

Journal Article

Publication Title

Energy Conversion and Management

Publisher

Elsevier

School

School of Engineering

RAS ID

29805

Comments

This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of:

Shafieian, A., & Khiadani, M. (2019). A novel solar-driven direct contact membrane-based water desalination system. Energy Conversion and Management, 199, Article 112055.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112055

Abstract

This study proposes a novel integrated solar membrane-based desalination system. The system includes vacuum glass tubes to increase absorbed solar energy and to decrease heat loss, heat pipes to transfer the absorbed energy efficiently, and a tubular direct contact membrane distillation module to use the absorbed energy more effectively. To improve the freshwater production rate and overall efficiency of the proposed system, a cooling unit was also added to the permeate loop of the desalination unit. The performance of the system was experimentally investigated without (Case I) and with (Case II) the cooling unit in summer and without the cooling unit in winter (Case III) under climatic conditions of Perth, Western Australia. The experimental results indicated that except a few minutes in the morning, the heat pipe solar system was able to provide all the required thermal energy for the desalination system. The maximum thermal efficiency of the solar system in summer reached ~78% and its exergy efficiency fluctuated between 4 and 5% for a noticeable amount of time from 10:30 AM to 3 PM. Moreover, the maximum freshwater production rate were 2.78, 3.81, and 2.1 L/m2h in Cases I, II, and III, respectively. The overall efficiency of the system improved from 46.6% in Case I to 61.8% in Case II showing the technical effectiveness of implementing the cooling unit in the permeate flow loop of the system. In addition, the daily averaged specific energy consumption in Cases I, II, and III were 407, 377, and 450 kWh/m3, respectively.

DOI

10.1016/j.enconman.2019.112055

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 License.

Share

 
COinS