Document Type
Journal Article
Publication Title
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
NLM (Medline)
School
School of Medical and Health Sciences
RAS ID
30437
Abstract
Fresh fruits and vegetables are a cornerstone of a balanced diet; their consumption has health, environmental, ethical, and economic implications. This pilot study aimed to: (i) measure fruit and vegetable consumption; (ii) understand consumer perceptions of the perceived importance of regionally grown fresh fruit and vegetables (RGFFV); and (iii) identify the barriers and enablers of access and consumption of RGFFV. The study took place in Tasmania (TAS) and South Western Australia (SWA). A 54-item survey included questions relating to purchasing and consumption patterns; barriers and enablers related to access and consumption of RGFFV; and sociodemographic information. Survey data were analyzed using Chi-square test and binary logistic regression. A total of n = 120 TAS and n = 123 SWA adult respondents participated. SWA respondents had higher intakes of fruit (p < 0.001) and vegetables (p < 0.001). Almost all respondents (97%) rated purchasing of RGFFV as important. Top enablers included produce freshness (97%), and to financially support local farmers (94%) and the local community (91%). Barriers included limited seasonal availability of the produce (26%), the belief that RGFFV were expensive (12%) and food budgetary constraints (10%). Recommendations include broader marketing and labelling of seasonal RGFFV; increasing ‘buy local’ campaigns; consumer information about how RGFFV benefits producers and communities; and pricing produce according to quality.
DOI
10.3390/ijerph17010063
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Comments
Godrich, S., Kent, K., Murray, S., Auckland, S., Lo, J., Blekkenhorst, L., ... & Devine, A. (2019). Australian consumer perceptions of regionally grown fruits and vegetables: Importance, enablers, and barriers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(1), Article 63. Available here